期刊文献+

面子建构论评析 被引量:2

A Review of Face Constituting Theory
原文传递
导出
摘要 当前学界的面子研究试图脱离礼貌研究的一般框架,建立独立的理论体系。Arundale(1999)提出的面子建构论(Face Constituting Theory)作为这其中的代表性理论,基于联合共建交际模式(Conjoint Co-constituting Model of Communication)(Arundale,1999),重点关照面子概念中的交互性和关系性,并采用会话分析的研究方法,从参与者视角探讨互动交际中的面子问题。本文在呈现面子建构论产生的背景、核心概念以及具体分析模式的基础上,对它的优势和不足进行评价,以期对未来的面子研究有所启示。 Theoretical models have been proposed to revisit the conceptualization of face as a challenge to the classic politeness paradigm, among which Face Constituting Theory (FCT) (Arundale, 1999) provides a full-range model to explain and explore human facework in interpersonal communication. Based on the framework of Conjoint Co-constituting Model of Communication (Arundale, 1999) , FCT conceptualizes face in terms of relational connection and separation in the interactional process between participants. In this paper, the theoretical background, the core notions, and the analytical framework of FCT are presented and reviewed, with the hope to provide implications for future research on face.
作者 李梦欣 李捷 LI Mengxin;LI Jie
出处 《外语教学理论与实践》 CSSCI 北大核心 2018年第3期13-19,33,共8页 Foreign Language Learning Theory And Practice
基金 江苏高校哲学社会科学研究重大项目“语言学视域下当代中国社会礼貌观的实证研究”(2017ZDAXM002)的部分成果.
关键词 面子建构论 联合共建交际模式 交互性 关系性 Face Constituting Theory Conjoint Co-constituting Model of Communication interactional relational
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献74

  • 1谢朝群,何自然.质疑“礼貌策略说”和“礼貌规范说”[J].福建师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2005(3):43-47. 被引量:28
  • 2李捷,何自然,霍永寿.语用学十二讲[M].上海:华东师范大学出版社,2011:173.
  • 3Bergvall, V. 1999. Toward a comprehensive theory of language and gender[ J]. Language in Society, (2) :273 -293.
  • 4Brown, P. & S. Levinson. 1987. Politeness:Some Universals in Lan- guage Usage [ M ]. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
  • 5Coates, J. 1998. Language and Gender: A Reader[ M]. Oxford: Blackwell.
  • 6Cruse, A. 2006. A Glossary of Semantics and Pragmatics [ M ]. Edin- burgh : Edinburgh University Press.
  • 7Curl, T. & P. Drew. 2008. Contingency and action : A comparison of two forms of requesting[ J]. Research on Language &Social Interac- tion, (2) :129 - 153.
  • 8Drew, P. 2011 a. Conversation, Context and Action:Requesting [ R ]. Paper Presented at the 12th China Pragmatics Conference & the 6th Annual Conference of China Pragmatics Association. Taiyuan: Shanxi University.
  • 9Drew, P. 2011b. The Micro-politics of Social Action in Interaction [R]. Paper Presented at the 12th International Pragmatics Confer- ence. Manchester: University of Manchester.
  • 10Grice, H. 1975. Logic and conversation [ A ]. In P. Cole & J. Morgan ( eds. ). Syntax and Semantics 3 : Speech Acts [ C ]. New York: Aca- demic Press.

共引文献66

同被引文献7

引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部