期刊文献+

多团队成员身份情境下团队间多样性对员工综合创新的影响机制研究 被引量:9

The Study of Mechanisms of Diversities among Teams on Employee General Innovation Based on Multiple Team Membership Model
下载PDF
导出
摘要 以员工同时参与多个工作团队为研究情境,分别从员工学习和身份冲突两个不同视角,研究团队间知识多样性与团队间氛围多样性对员工综合创新的影响机制。研究结果表明,团队间知识多样性会促进员工学习,进而提升员工的综合创新;团队间氛围多样性会导致员工身份冲突,进而抑制员工的综合创新。对二元路径相互影响的分析则表明,身份冲突会强化员工学习与员工综合创新的正向关系,而员工学习则会弱化身份冲突与员工综合创新的负向关系。研究结论完善了团队多样性理论,也为多团队成员身份模式管理实践提供了建议。 Multiple team membership(MTM)model is becoming increasingly predominant in most organizations.How would MTM influence employee general innovation?This paper focuses on the mechanisms of diversities among teams on general innovation.The empirical study shows that knowledge diversity among teams would promote employee learning,which is positively related with employee general innovation,and the relationship between employee learning and general innovation would be stronger under higher identity conflict.Atmosphere diversity among teams would promote identity conflict,which is negatively related with employee general innovation,and the relationship between identity conflict and general innovation would be weaker under higher employee learning.
作者 段光 庞长伟 DUAN Guang;PANG Changwei(Nanjing University of Science and Technology,Nanjing,China)
出处 《管理学报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2018年第9期1285-1294,共10页 Chinese Journal of Management
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(71502082) 中央高校基本科研业务费专项基金资助项目(30917013105)
关键词 团队间知识多样性 团队间氛围多样性 员工学习 身份冲突 综合创新 knowledge diversity among teams atmosphere diversity among teams employeelearning identity conflict general innovation
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献130

  • 1刘嘉,许燕.团队异质性研究回顾与展望[J].心理科学进展,2006,14(4):636-640. 被引量:52
  • 2周密,赵文红,姚小涛.社会关系视角下的知识转移理论研究评述及展望[J].科研管理,2007,28(3):78-85. 被引量:56
  • 3Ekavll, G., 1996, "Organizational Climate for Creativity and Innovation", European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 5, pp.105-123.
  • 4Neil R. Anderson & Michael A. West, 1998, "Measuring Climate for Work Group Innovation: Development and Validation of the Team Climate Inventory", Journal of Organizational Behavior, 19, pp.235-258.
  • 5Amabile, T. M., Conti, R., Coon, H.,Lazenby, J. & Herron, M., 1996, "Assessing the Work Enviornment for Creativity", Academy of Management Journal, vol.39(5), pp.1154-1184.
  • 6Isaksen, S. G., Lauer K. J. & Ekvall, G., 1999, "Situational Outlook Questionnaire: A Measure of the Climate for Creativity and Change", Psychological Reports, 85, pp.665-674.
  • 7Amabile, T. M., 1997, "Motivating Creativity in Organizations", California Management Review, vol. 40(1), pp.22-26.
  • 8Scott, S. G. & Bruce, R. A., 1994, "Determinants of Innovative Behavior: A Path Model of Individual Innovation in the Work Place", Academy of Management Journal, 37, pp.580-607.
  • 9Onne Janssen, 2000, "Job Demands, Perceptions of Effort-reward Fairness and Innovative work Behavior", Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 73, pp.287-302.
  • 10Amabile, T. M., 1993, "Motivational Synergy: Toward New Conceptualizations of Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivation in the Workplace", Human Resource Management Review, 3, pp. 185-201.

共引文献349

同被引文献96

引证文献9

二级引证文献34

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部