期刊文献+

HEART评分对急诊胸痛患者心血管不良事件的预测价值 被引量:4

Predictive value of HEART scores for cardiovascular adverse events in the patients with emergency chest pain
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的评估HEART评分在急诊非ST段抬高心源性胸痛患者心血管事件发生的预测价值。方法选择2015年10月~2016年12月在我院收治的急诊非ST段抬高的心源性胸痛患者,分为急性冠脉综合征组(acute coronary syndrome,ACS)和心绞痛组,比较两组HEART评分,并随访治疗30 d后心血管不良事件发生情况。结果本研究纳入97例患者,ACS组60例,平均年龄(62.25±7.21)岁,HEART危险程度评分为(7.55±0.89)分;心绞痛组37例,平均年龄(70.03±10.59)岁,HEART危险程度评分为(5.22±1.27)分。ACS组的HEART评分显著高于心绞痛组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。30 d随访发生心血管不良事件概率为21.6%,HEART评分6时对30 d心血管不良事件的发生有良好的预测价值,ROC曲线下面积为0.922(95%CI 0.868~0.977),不同HEART评分危险分层30 d心血管不良事件概率分别为0~3分(1.0%)、4~6分(5.15%)、7~10分(16.5%)。结论 EART评分能够有效、简单、快速、准确评估非ST段抬高急诊胸痛患者的心血管事件发生风险,对急诊科快速病情评估和诊治过程起到非常重要的作用。 Objective To evaluate the predictive value of HEART scores in the occurrence of cardiovascular events in the patients with non-ST elevation cardiogenic chest pain in emergency department. Methods Patients with non-ST elevation cardiogenic chest pain who were admitted to the emergency department in our hospital from October 2015 to December 2016 were divided into acute coronary syndrome (ACS) group and angina group. The HEART scores were compared between the two groups, and occurrence of cardiovascular adverse events were followed-up 30 days after treatment. Results 97 patients were included in this study. 60 patients were in the ACS group, with an average age of (62.25±7.21)years old. HEART risk score was(7.55±0.89)points; there were 37 cases in the angina group, with an average age of (70.03±10.59) years old. HEART risk score was(5.22±1.27)points. The HEART score in ACS group was significantly higher than that in angina group, and the difference was statistically significant(P〈0.05). The probability of cardiovascular adverse events was 21.6% at the 30-day follow-up visit. When the HEART score was 6, there was a good predictive value for the occurrence of 30-day cardiovascular adverse events. The area under the ROC curve was 0.922(95% CI 0.868±0.977). The probabilities of 30-day cardiovascular adverse events at different HEART scores of risk stratification were 0-3 points( 1.0% ), 4-6 points (5.15%), and 7-10 points (16.5%). Conclusion HEART scores can effectively, simply, quickly and accurately assess the risk of cardiovascular events in non-ST elevation patients with chest pain, which plays a very important role in the rapid disease assessment and diagnosis and treatment process in the emergency department.
作者 廖云海 卢静 王志民 LIAO Yunhai;LU Jing;WANG Zhimin(Department of Emergency,the Second People's Hospital of Fujian Province,Fujian University of Traditional Chinese Medicine,Fuzhou 350001,China)
出处 《中国现代医生》 2018年第24期12-14,18,共4页 China Modern Doctor
基金 福建中医药大学校管课题(XB2015020)
关键词 HEART评分 非ST段抬高 急诊胸痛 心血管不良事件 HEART scores Non-ST elevation Emergency chest pain Cardiovascular adverse events
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

二级参考文献65

  • 1National Health Survey:Physician Contacts by Sociogeographicand Health Characteristics[J].Series,1993,10(161):1982-1983.
  • 2Cochrane DG,Allegra JR,Graff LG.Epidemiology of observationser vices.In:Graff L,ed.Obser vation Medicine[M].Boston:Andover Medical Publishers,1993:37-45.
  • 3Graff LG,Dallara J,Ross MA,et al.Impact on the care of theemergency department chest pain patient from the chest pain evalutionregistry(CHEPER)study[J].AM J Cardiol,1997,80(5):563-568.
  • 4Gibler WB,Runyon JP,Levy RC,et al.A rapid diagnostic andtreatment center for patients with chest pain in the emergencydepartment[J].Ann Emerg Med,1995,25(1):1-8.
  • 5Boersma E,Pieper KS,Steyerberg EW,et al.for the PURSUITinverstigtors.Predictors of outcome in the patients with acutecoronary syndromes without persistent ST-segment elevation.Results from an international trial of 9461 patients[J].Circulation,2000,101(22):2557-2567.
  • 6Antman em,Cohen Mk,Bernink PJLM,et al.The TIMI risk score forunstale angina/non-st elevation MI[J].JAMA,2000,284(7):835-842.
  • 7Ishii J, Ozaki Y, Lu J, et al. Prognostic value of serum concentration of heart-type fatty acid-bindingprotein relative to cardiac troponin T on admission in the early hours of acute coronary syndrome [J]. Clin Chem, 2005,51 (8) : 1397.
  • 8Morrow DA, de Lemos JA, Sabatine MS, et al. The search for a biomarker of cardiac ischemia [J]. Clin Chem, 2003,49 (4) : 537.
  • 9Louise Cullen, Christian Mueller, William A, et al. Validation of High-Sensitivity Troponin I in a 2-Hour Diagnostic Strategy to Assess 30-Day Outcomes inEmergency Department Patients With Possible Acute Coronary Syndrome[J ]. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 2013,62 (14) : 1242.
  • 10Martin Than, Louise Cullen, Sally Aldous, et al. 2- Hour Accelerated Diagnostic Protocol to Assess Patients With Chest Pain Symptoms Using Contemporary Troponins as the Only Biomarker [J]. J Am Coil Cardiol. 2012.59(23), 2091.

共引文献71

同被引文献51

引证文献4

二级引证文献12

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部