期刊文献+

异质信念、套利限制与低换手率溢价之谜 被引量:5

Mystery of Heterogeneous Beliefs,Arbitrage Restrictions,and Low Turnover Rate Premiums
下载PDF
导出
摘要 基于1995~2017年2698家中国A股市场上市公司数据,利用Fama-Mac Beth回归、排序分组等方法实证分析低换手率溢价存在性及其影响因素。实证结果表明,中国股票市场存在显著的低换手率溢价现象,当期换手率低的股票能够获得更高的预期收益;尽管股票换手率能够反映其流动性,然而流动性溢价不能较好解释低换手率效应,投资者的异质信念和套利限制对低换手率溢价的解释力更强。究其原因,低换手率溢价由投资者异质信念与市场套利限制共同造成的错误定价和价格的延期纠正。因此,投资者应回归到理性投资,切忌盲目追热。 Based on the data of 2,698 listed companies in China' s A-share market from1995 to 2017,this study applied the Fama-Mac Beth regression,sorting,and grouping methods to empirically analyze the existence of low turnover rate premiums and their influencing factors. The empirical results show that the low turnover rate premium in China's stock market is significantly low. Stocks with a low turnover rate in the current period are able to achieve higher expected returns. Although the turnover rate can reflect the liquidity of a stock,liquidity premiums do not effectively explain the low turnover rate. Instead,the heterogeneous beliefs of investors and arbitrage restrictions explain low turnover rate premiums better. This is because low turnover rate premiums are corrected by the mispricing and price delays caused by the heterogeneous beliefs of investors and arbitrage restrictions in the market. Therefore,investors should depend on rational investment and avoid blindly speculating on popular stocks.
作者 陈慰 张兵 徐硕正 Chen Wei;Zhang Bing;Xu Shuozheng(School of Business,Nanjing University,Nanjing,Jiangsu 210093,China)
机构地区 南京大学商学院
出处 《金融经济学研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2018年第4期109-118,共10页 Financial Economics Research
关键词 换手率效应 异质信念 套利限制 turnover rate effect heterogeneous belief arbitrage restriction
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献42

  • 1孔东民.流动性风险与资产定价:来自中国股市的证据[J].南方经济,2006,35(3):91-107. 被引量:19
  • 2张维,张永杰.异质信念、卖空限制与风险资产价格[J].管理科学学报,2006,9(4):58-64. 被引量:111
  • 3沈可挺,刘煜辉.中国股市中惯性与反向投资策略的获利模式[J].管理科学学报,2006,9(6):43-52. 被引量:22
  • 4O' Hara M. Market Microstructure Theory [ M ] .Blackwell Publishers, 1995.
  • 5Pastor Lubos, Robert F Stambaugh. Liquidity Risk and Expected Stock Returns [ J ]. Journal of Political Economy, 2003,111 (3) :642-685.
  • 6Amihud Y, Mcndelson H. Asset Pricing and the Bidask Spread [ J ]. Journal of Financial Economics, 1986,17 (2) : 223-249.
  • 7Amihud Y, Mendelson H. The Effect of Beta, Bidask Spread, Residual Risk and Size on Stock Returns [ J ]. Journal of Finance, 1989,44(2) :479-486.
  • 8Brennan M J, Subrahmanyam A. Market Microstructure and Asset Pricing:On the Compensation for Illiquidity in Stock Returns [ J ]. Journal of Financial Economics, 1996,41 (3) :441-464.
  • 9Glosten L, Harris L. Estimating the Components of the Bid-ask Spread [ J ] . Journal of Financial Economics, 1988,21 ( 1 ) : 123-142.
  • 10Hasbrouck J. Measuring the Information Contents of Stock Trades [ J ]. Journal of Finance, 1991,46( 1 ) : 179-207.

共引文献389

同被引文献46

引证文献5

二级引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部