期刊文献+

话语意义模式研究 被引量:3

On Models of Utterance Meaning
下载PDF
导出
摘要 虽然经过长期探究,意义研究业已取得硕果,但是学界对于意义本质的追问远没有终止。相反,在世纪转折处形成诸多新型理论,而围绕这些理论的探索方兴未艾。本文将对在话语意义内涵的探讨中逐渐形成的广为接受的几种模式进行梳理和分析,讨论其优势和问题,并根据意义阐释的时间顺序和层级构建温和语境论框架下的四元意义模式,以期提供一种新型的话语意义阐释路径,对众多关涉话语意义的疑难问题进行阐释,这对促进语言学的可持续发展,消解甚或解决其内部的重大问题均有启示意义。 As a central issue of contemporary linguistics and philosophy of language, the problem of utterance meaning has long been explored and is still extensively investigated today. Through long-term exploration, researchers have made impressive achievements in their pursuit of meaning although there is still a long way to go. In fact, many related theories have been put forward in the turn of the century and investigations surrounding them are thriving. This paper analyzes the well-acknowledged models of utterance meaning formed in the investigations on content of utterance meaning, discusses their contributions and problems, and therefore provides a four-level model of utterance meaning on the basis of chronological order and hierarchy of meaning interpretation,which will offer approaches to some problems concerning utterance meaning, propel the sustainable development of philosophy of language and shed light on solving some significant problems in the field of philosophy of language.
作者 伍思静 张荆欣 韩松 Wu Si-jing;Zhang Jing-xin;Han Song(Jilin University,Changchun 130012,China)
机构地区 吉林大学
出处 《外语学刊》 CSSCI 北大核心 2018年第5期60-66,共7页 Foreign Language Research
基金 吉林大学基本科研业务费种子基金项目“多维视角下的当代意义理论研究”(451160302286) 吉林大学基本科研业务费哲学社会科学研究项目“‘保罗书信’劝勉语篇研究”(2015QY011)的阶段性成果
关键词 话语意义 语义学 语用学 语境 utterance meaning semantics pragmatics context
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献36

  • 1王嘉龄.语音学与音系学的趋同倾向[J].外语教学与研究,1996,28(2):29-33. 被引量:10
  • 2现代汉语词典(第五版)[Z].北京:商务印书馆,2005.
  • 3Bach, K. & R. Hamish. Linguistic Communication and Speech Acts [M]. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press, 1979.
  • 4Bach, K. Thought and Reference [M]. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1987.
  • 5Bach, K. The semantics-pragmaticsdistinction: what it is and why it matters [A]. In K. Turner (ed). The Semanties/Pragmaties Interface from Different Points of niew [C]. Oxford: Elserview Science, 1999.
  • 6Bach, K. & Bezuidenhout, A. Distinguishing semantics and pragmatics [A]. In J. K. Campbell, M. O'Rourke & D. Shier (eds). Meanfng and Truth: Investigations in Philosophical Semantics [C]. New York: Seven Bridges Press, 2002.
  • 7Bach, K. Semantics, pragmatics [A]. In J. Keim Campbell M. O'Rourke & D. Shier (eds). Meaning and Truth [C]. New York: Seven Bridges Press, 2002.
  • 8Bach, K. Minding the gap [A]. In C. Bianchi (ed).The Semantics/Pragmatics Distinction [C]. CSLI Publications, 2004.
  • 9Bach, K. Context ex machina [A]. In Z. Szabo (ed).Semantics vs. Pragmatics [C]. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005.
  • 10Bach, K. Regressions in pragmatics (and semantics) [A]. In Burton Roberts, Noel (ed). Advances in Pragmatics [C]. England: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007.

共引文献9

同被引文献18

引证文献3

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部