期刊文献+

腹腔镜结合胆道镜保胆取石术与腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗胆囊结石的临床效果比较 被引量:9

Analysis of curative effect and safety of laparoscopy combined with choledochoscopy in treatment of gallstones
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的比较腹腔镜结合胆道镜保胆取石术与腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗胆囊结石的临床效果。方法选取该院2014-03~2016-04收治的胆囊结石患者100例,根据手术实施方法的不同分为观察组(实施腹腔镜结合胆道镜保胆取石术)及对照组(实施腹腔镜胆囊切除术),各50例。比较两组手术疗效及安全性。结果观察组术中出血量、术后24 h疼痛评分及住院时间均低于对照组,术后并发症发生率低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P <0. 05);术后12个月观察组胆囊收缩功能及胆囊壁厚度较术前显著改善,差异有统计学意义(P <0. 05)。结论腹腔镜结合胆道镜保胆取石术治疗胆囊结石临床效果较腹腔镜胆囊切除术好,患者术中出血量少,住院时间短,术后并发症少,且术后胆囊功能明显改善,安全可靠。 Objective To analyze the efficacy and safety of laparoscopy combined with choledochoscopy in treatment of gallstones. Methods 100 patients with cholecystolithiasis admitted to our hospital from March 2014 to April 2016 were divided into the observation group(treated with laparoscopy combined with choledochoscopy, n=50) and the control group(treated with laparoscopy, n=50) according to different operative methods. The surgical efficacy and safety were compared between the two groups. Results The intraoperative blood loss, postoperative 24 h pain scores and hospitalization time in the observation group were significantly lower or shorter than those in the control group. The incidence of postoperative complications in the observation group was lower than that in the control group(P〈0.05). The gallbladder contraction function and thickness of gallbladder wall in the observation group improved significantly after the operation(P〈0.05). Conclusion Laparoscopy combined with choledochoscopy is safer and more effective than laparoscopic cholecystectomy for the patients with gallstones. Laparoscopy combined with choledochoscopy can shorten the time of hospitalization, reduce the postoperative complications, and improve the postoperative gallbladder function.
作者 刘向伟 LIU Xiang-wei(Department of General Surgery,the Second People′s Hospital of Yongcheng City,Henan 476600,China)
出处 《中国临床新医学》 2018年第9期928-930,共3页 CHINESE JOURNAL OF NEW CLINICAL MEDICINE
关键词 腹腔镜 胆道镜 保胆取石术 胆囊结石 疗效 安全性 Laparoscopy Choledochoscopy Gallbladder surgery Gallstones Efficacy Safety
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献80

  • 1王立新.腹腔镜胆总管取石的入路选择[J].中华临床医师杂志(电子版),2012,6(21):6657-6659. 被引量:11
  • 2黄志强.肝内胆管结石手术方法的选择[J].中国实用外科杂志,1994,14(3):136-137. 被引量:181
  • 3张绍庚,陈永标,魏炜明,詹晓静,高远,张坤.免T管腹腔镜辅助肝切除治疗肝内外胆管结石11例[J].中国微创外科杂志,2006,6(5):352-353. 被引量:4
  • 4肝胆管结石病诊断治疗指南[J].中华消化外科杂志,2007,6(2):156-160. 被引量:445
  • 5Dasari BV,Tan C J, Gurusamy KS, et al. Surgical versus endoscopic treatment of bile duct stones. Cochrane Database Syst Rev ,2013,12: CD003327.
  • 6Rojas-Ortega S, Arizpe-Bravo D, Martn L6pez ER, et al. Transcystic common bile duct exploration in the management of patients with choledocholithiasis. J Gastrointest Surg ,2003,7 ( 4 ) :492 - 496.
  • 7Reinders JS, Gouma DJ, Ubbink DT, et al. Transcystic or transductal stone extraction during single-stage treatment of choledochocystolithiasis : a systematic review. World J Surg,2014,38 (9) :2403 -2411.
  • 8Lyass S, Phillips EH. Laparoscopic transcystic duct common bile duct exploration. J Surg Endosc ,2006,20( Supple 2 ) :441 - 445.
  • 9Chen XM, Zhang Y, Cai HH, et al. Transcystic approach with micro-incision of the cystic duct and its confluence part in laparoscopic common bile duct exploration. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A,2013, 23(12) : 977 -981.
  • 10Zhu JG, klan W, Zhang ZT, et al. Short-term outcomes of laparoscopic transeystic common bile duct exploration with discharge less than 24 hours. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A ,2014,2g (5) : 302 - 305.

共引文献399

同被引文献96

引证文献9

二级引证文献63

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部