期刊文献+

不同支撑方案对钢筋混凝土框架结构抗倒塌能力研究 被引量:1

Study on Support Schemes on Vulnerable Building Structures
下载PDF
导出
摘要 结构抗倒塌性能一直以来是地震工程界普遍关注的重点。在地震多发地区,对工程结构采用简易木构件从外部进行斜向支撑的情况大量存在,然而简单支撑维护方式缺乏科学的设计与安全评价。针对这一问题,以城镇、乡村中常见的三层两跨钢筋混凝土框架结构为例,采用增量动力分析(Incremental Dynamic Analysis,简称IDA)方法并结合结构易损性分析方程,对结构倒塌易损性开展定量分析。对比研究不同支撑方案对结构倒塌易损性的影响,探讨不同支撑方案对提高结构抗震性能的影响。结果表明,简单的外部支撑能够有效的提高结构的抗倒塌性能,合理的支撑方案能够更加有效地提高其支撑能力。 The structural collapse resistance has always been an important part of seismic engineering.In seismic regions, it is common to use simple braces to enhance the collapse resistance of residential building structures. However, these simple support measures are usually lack of scientific design and assessment. This study analysis the collapse safety of this vulnerable building and five support schemes, taking a typical poorly designed two-bay and three-storey RC frame building structure as a study object. The quantitative analysis is organized to assess the collapse safety by using incremental dynamic analysis and structural fragility function. The results show that the simple brace can improve the seismic collapse safety of the vulnerable building, and the enhance scheme can be more efficient with scientific evaluation.
作者 卢鹏洁 王国新 Peng-jie;WANG Guo-xin(State Key Laboratory of Coastal and Offshore Engineering,Dalian University of Technology,Liaoning Dalian 116024,China;Institute of Earthquake Engineering,School of Hydraulic Engineering,Faculty of Infrastructure Engineering,Dalian University of Technology,Liaoning Dalian 116024,China)
出处 《防灾减灾学报》 2018年第3期1-5,共5页 Journal of Disaster Prevention And Reduction
基金 "十二五"国家科技支撑计划资助项目(2014BAL05B03) 国家自然科学基金资助项目(51378092/51578113)
关键词 抗倒塌能力 增量动力分析 倒塌易损性 支撑位置 支撑方案 collapse resistance incremental dynamic analysis support location enhance scheme
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献20

  • 1Park Y,Ang A. Mechanistic seismic damage model for reinforced concrete [ J ]. Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, 1985,111 (4) : 722-739.
  • 2ASCE/SE 41-13 Seismic evaluation and retrofit of existing buildings [ S]. Reston, VA: American Society of Civil Engineers, 2014.
  • 3Qi Y, Han X, Ji J. Failure mode classification of reinforced concrete column using Fisher method [ J ~. Journal of Central South University, 2013, 20 (10) : 2863 -2869.
  • 4Federal Emergency Management Agency. Quantification of building seismic performance factors [ R ]. Washington DC : Federal Emergency Management Agency, 2008.
  • 5Vamvatsikos D, Coruell C A. Incremental dynamic analysis [ J ]. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics ,2002,31 ( 3 ) : 491-514.
  • 6Federal Emergency Management Agency. Recommended seismic design criteria for new steel moment-frame buildings [ R ]. Washington DC : Federal Emergency Management Agency,2000.
  • 7Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center. PEER strong motion database [ DB/OL ]. Berkley, California : Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center. [ 2014-01-10 ].http://peer, berkeley, edu/smcat/ index, html.
  • 8Computers & Structures Inc. PERFORM-3D: nonlinear analysis and performance assessment for 3-D structures : user guide [ M ]. Berkeley, CA : Computers & Structures Inc. 2006.
  • 9Mander ~ B ,Priestley M ~ N ,Park R. Theoretical stress- strain model for confined concrete [ J ]. Journal of Structural Division, ASCE, 1988,114 ( 8 ) : 1804-1826.
  • 10王亚勇.汶川地震建筑震害启示——抗震概念设计[J].建筑结构学报,2008,29(4):20-25. 被引量:233

共引文献9

同被引文献60

引证文献1

二级引证文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部