中国跨境破产国际合作的法律问题研究--以韩进破产案为例

Research on the legal issues of international cooperation in cross-border insolvency in China--taking the bankruptcy of Hanjin as an example

"修正的属地主义""修正的普及主义"和"国际司法协商"三种方式逐渐打破以往"属地主义原则"和"普及主义原则"两分的立法模式,成为各国跨境破产程序域外效力立法模式的主流选择。在中国跨境破产国际合作建设中,韩进破产案件对中国跨境破产国际合作模式的选择有着深远影响。中国应当选择"修正的属地主义"立法模式,积极承认外国破产程序的效力,引入主要破产程序与附属破产程序概念,积极参与跨境破产合作。在"一带一路"与司法国际化建设背景下,《中华人民共和国破产法》第5条的互惠原则应当继续细化完善,坚持《南宁声明》承诺的互惠做法,先行给予对方国家当事人司法协助,积极促成互惠关系。在缺少跨境破产具体程序规定的情况下,借鉴示范法具体内容,个案适用破产议定书模式,建立灵活有效的跨境破产国际合作制度。

The previous dichotomy of ＂localist principles＂and ＂popularism＂is gradually broken. The legislative model of＂corrected territorialism＂,＂corrected universalism＂and＂international judicial consultation＂has become the mainstream of the extraterritorial effect in cross-border insolvency proceedings. In the construction of international cooperation in cross-border insolvency in China,the case of Hanjin bankruptcy has far-reaching influence on the choice of China＇s international cooperation model. China should choose the ＂corrected territorialism＂legislative model,actively recognize the effectiveness of foreign bankruptcy procedures,introduce the concepts of main bankruptcy process and subsidiary bankruptcy procedure,and take part actively in cross-border insolvency cooperation. Under the background of the Belt and Road proposal and the internationalization of China＇s judiciary,the principle of reciprocity of Article 5 of the Bankruptcy Law of the People＇s Republic of China should be refined and improved further,the reciprocal approach as promised by the Nanning Declaration should be adhered. China should give first-party legal assistance to the other party and actively promote a mutually beneficial relationship with others. In the absence of specific procedures for cross-border insolvency,China should draw on the specific content of the Model Law and applys the model of bankruptcy protocol to the specific case,so as to make China＇s cross-border insolvency cooperation system more scientific and reasonable.