电视胸腔镜辅助及常规手术治疗多发肋骨骨折的对比分析

Comparative Analysis of Multiple Rib Fractures Treated With Video-assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery and Conventional Surgery

目的分析电视胸腔镜辅助及常规手术治疗多发肋骨骨折的临床效果。方法选取本院接受诊治的多发肋骨骨折患者46例作为研究对象。依据治疗方法差异,将其分为对照组(n=22,常规手术治疗)和观察组(n=24,电视胸腔镜辅助手术)。结果观察组术后胸腔引流时间、胸痛缓解时间以及住院时间均低于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(P <0.05);观察组术后并发症发生率(16.67%)低于对照组的(45.45%),差异具有统计学意义(P <0.05)。结论治疗多发肋骨骨折过程中,与常规手术治疗相比,电视胸腔镜辅助手术治疗具有微创手术优势,有效促进患者康复。

Objective To analyze the clinical effects of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery and conventional surgery for the treatment of multiple rib fractures. Methods 46 cases of multiple rib fractures treated in our hospital were selected as the research objects. According to the different treatment methods, they were divided into control group （n=22, conventional surgery） and observation group （n=24, video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery）. Results The postoperative thoracic drainage time, chest pain relief time and hospitalization time of the observation group were lower than those of the control group, the difference was statistically significant （P 〈 0.05）. The incidence of postoperative complications in the observation group （16.67%） was lower than that in the control group （45.45%）. The difference was statistically signifcant （P 〈 0.05）. Conclusion In the treatment of multiple rib fractures, compared with conventional surgical treatment, video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery has the advantage of minimally invasive surgery and can effectively promote the recovery of patients.