摘要
Dear Editor, Many human genetic diseases are caused by pathogenic single nucleotide mutations. Animal models are often used to study these diseases where the pathogenic point mutations are created and/or corrected through gene editing （e.g., the CRISPP-JCas9 system） （Komor et al., 2017; Liang et al., 2017）. CRISPR/Cas9-mediated gene editing depends on DNA double-strand breaks （DSBs）, which can be of low efficiency and lead to indels and off-target cleavage （Kim et al., 2016）. We and others have shown that base editors （BEs） may represent an attractive alternative for disease mouse model generation （Liang et al., 2017; Kim et al., 2017）. Compared to CRISPR/ Cas9, cytidine base editors （CBEs） can generate C·G to T·A mutations in mouse zygotes without activating DSB repair pathways （Liang et al., 2017; Kim et al., 2017; Komor et al., 2016）. In addition, CBEs showed much lower off-targets than CRISPR]Cas9 （Kim et al., 2017）, making the editing process potentially safer and more controllable. Recently, adenine base editors （ABEs） that were developed from the tRNA- specific adenosine deaminase （TADA） of Escherichia coli were also reported （Gaudelli et al., 2017）. As a RNA-guided programmable adenine deaminase, ABE can catalyze the conversion of A to I. Following DNA replication, base I is replaced by G, resulting in A·T to G·C conversion （Gaudelli et al., 2017; Hu et al., 2018）. The development of ABEs has clearly expanded the editing capacity and application of BEs. Here, we tested whether ABEs could effectively generate disease mouse models, and found high efficiency by ABEs in producing edited mouse zygotes and mice with single-nucleotide substitutions.
Dear Editor, Many human genetic diseases are caused by pathogenic single nucleotide mutations. Animal models are often used to study these diseases where the pathogenic point mutations are created and/or corrected through gene editing （e.g., the CRISPP-JCas9 system） （Komor et al., 2017; Liang et al., 2017）. CRISPR/Cas9-mediated gene editing depends on DNA double-strand breaks （DSBs）, which can be of low efficiency and lead to indels and off-target cleavage （Kim et al., 2016）. We and others have shown that base editors （BEs） may represent an attractive alternative for disease mouse model generation （Liang et al., 2017; Kim et al., 2017）. Compared to CRISPR/ Cas9, cytidine base editors （CBEs） can generate C·G to T·A mutations in mouse zygotes without activating DSB repair pathways （Liang et al., 2017; Kim et al., 2017; Komor et al., 2016）. In addition, CBEs showed much lower off-targets than CRISPR]Cas9 （Kim et al., 2017）, making the editing process potentially safer and more controllable. Recently, adenine base editors （ABEs） that were developed from the tRNA- specific adenosine deaminase （TADA） of Escherichia coli were also reported （Gaudelli et al., 2017）. As a RNA-guided programmable adenine deaminase, ABE can catalyze the conversion of A to I. Following DNA replication, base I is replaced by G, resulting in A·T to G·C conversion （Gaudelli et al., 2017; Hu et al., 2018）. The development of ABEs has clearly expanded the editing capacity and application of BEs. Here, we tested whether ABEs could effectively generate disease mouse models, and found high efficiency by ABEs in producing edited mouse zygotes and mice with single-nucleotide substitutions.
