《大众哲学》的实践向度解读

The Practice Interpretation of Popular Philosophy

《大众哲学》自第一版出版以来,就受到个别"学院君子们"的不正确解读。这种情况并没有随着时代变迁而消失,尽管褒贬立场不同,当今一些学者仍然以一种外部反思式的解读方式对其进行解读,特别是当代解构哲学背景下出现了解构现象。这种解读方式是传统西方哲学非历史、超现实、僵化的思维方式在当今以《大众哲学》为内容的又一次体现,这种缺乏实践向度的解读既不符合中国哲学思维方式,也不符合马克思主义哲学思维方式。相反,在中国哲学与马克思主义哲学视域内,《大众哲学》无疑都是哲学研究的典范,关键问题在于我们用什么方式进行解读,于是也决定了我们从中读出什么。

＂ Popular philosophy＂ , since the front page is published, has been incorrectly interpreted by the gentlemen in academy. This condition has not disappeared as the time flies, and today the gentlemen in academy are still interpreting it in the way of exernal reflection with a standpoint of agreeing or denying, and especially, deconstruction appears surrounding ＂ Popular philosophy＂ under the background of contemporary deconstruction philosophy. And what we should know is that this mode of interpretation is another manifestation of the non-historical, surrealistic and rigid thinking mode of traditional western philosophy, which takes ＂ popular philosophy＂ as its content. This kind of unpractical interpretation is neither in line with the Chinese philosophical thinking mode nor the Marxist philosophical thinking mode. On the contrary ,＂ Popular philosophy＂ can been undoubtedly seen as the model of philosophy in the view of both the Chinese philosophy and the philosophy of Marx . The way of interpreting that we take is the key to the question ,and decides what we can interpret from it.