期刊文献+

Evaluation of Ion Release from Four Dental Sealants

Evaluation of Ion Release from Four Dental Sealants
下载PDF
导出
摘要 The purpose of this study was to determine the ion release from four commercially available pit-and-fissure sealants [3M Clinpro, 3M ConciseTM, BeautiSealant (BS), and GI FX-Ⅱ)]. With each brand, 18 specimens were prepared. Their fluoride release in de-ionized water was measured by fluoride electrode, while the release of silicate (Si), aluminum (A1), sodium (Na), calcium (Ca), strontium (Sr), and phosphorus (P) was measured by inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectroscopy (ICP-AES) on days 1, 3, 7, 14, 21, and 28. The result showed that fluoride was not released from 3M ConciseTM. GI FX-II displayed the largest fluoride release, which, however, dropped rapidly on day 3.3M Clinpro exhibited less fluoride release than GI FX-II and BS did. At any time during the 28-day experimental period, GI FX-II released more Na than the other sealants (P〈0.001). BS ranked the second in Na release, and a small amount of Na ions was released from the 3M Clinpro and 3M ConciseTM samples. Al ions were only detected from BS and GI FX-Ⅱ, but not from the 3M Clinpro and 3M ConciseTM. Additionally GI FX-II had the largest Si release among the four brands at any time during the experimental period (P〈0.001). Ca ions were detected from 3M Clinpro and 3M ConciseTM, but not from GI FX-Ⅱ. BS released more Sr than the other sealants at any time during the experimental period (P〈0.001). All the samples released similar amounts of P continuously during these 28 days. In conclusion, based on the type and the amount of ion release, BS is the best pit-and-fissure sealant among the four brands. The purpose of this study was to determine the ion release from four commercially available pit-and-fissure sealants [3M Clinpro, 3M ConciseTM, BeautiSealant (BS), and GI FX-Ⅱ)]. With each brand, 18 specimens were prepared. Their fluoride release in de-ionized water was measured by fluoride electrode, while the release of silicate (Si), aluminum (A1), sodium (Na), calcium (Ca), strontium (Sr), and phosphorus (P) was measured by inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectroscopy (ICP-AES) on days 1, 3, 7, 14, 21, and 28. The result showed that fluoride was not released from 3M ConciseTM. GI FX-II displayed the largest fluoride release, which, however, dropped rapidly on day 3.3M Clinpro exhibited less fluoride release than GI FX-II and BS did. At any time during the 28-day experimental period, GI FX-II released more Na than the other sealants (P〈0.001). BS ranked the second in Na release, and a small amount of Na ions was released from the 3M Clinpro and 3M ConciseTM samples. Al ions were only detected from BS and GI FX-Ⅱ, but not from the 3M Clinpro and 3M ConciseTM. Additionally GI FX-II had the largest Si release among the four brands at any time during the experimental period (P〈0.001). Ca ions were detected from 3M Clinpro and 3M ConciseTM, but not from GI FX-Ⅱ. BS released more Sr than the other sealants at any time during the experimental period (P〈0.001). All the samples released similar amounts of P continuously during these 28 days. In conclusion, based on the type and the amount of ion release, BS is the best pit-and-fissure sealant among the four brands.
出处 《Current Medical Science》 SCIE CAS 2018年第3期524-529,共6页 当代医学科学(英文)
关键词 ion release dental sealant ion release dental sealant
  • 相关文献

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部