期刊文献+

美国公立大学录取政策的变革与未来

The Change and Future of Admission Policies in American Public Universities
下载PDF
导出
摘要 美国公立大学自成立之后,就存在着录取工作,录取政策的成熟与完善标志着公立大学的稳定发展,美国公立大学具有一定的组织管理能力,也具有其独特的录取政策,录取政策的实施能够让大学更好地招生,让大学的整体质量存在保障,从而在录取政策中需要考虑很多因素,录取受到经费、人力、物力、环境等的制约。美国公立大学的录取政策根据其所处的环境以及其建设理念存在差异,灵活多样。本文通过探讨美国公立大学录取政策,从而理清美国公立大学在录取方面的特色,从而为研究者提供可供参考的材料。 Since the establishment of American public universities, there have been admissions. The maturity and improvement of the admission policy marks the stable development of public universities. The public universities in the United States have certain organizational management capabilities, and they also have their unique admission policies. The implementation of admission policies can let the university enroll better and ensure the overall quality of the university. Therefore, many factors need to be considered in the admission policy. The admission is subject to financial, human, material and environmental constraints. The admission policies of public universities in the United States vary according to their environment and their construction philosophy. This article explores the admissions policy of public universities in the United States, so as to clarify the characteristics of public universities in the United States, so as to provide researchers with reference materials.
作者 李章逍 LI Zhangxiao(College of Education,Zhejiang University,Hangzhou,Zhejiang 310028)
出处 《科教导刊》 2018年第27期9-10,共2页 The Guide Of Science & Education
关键词 美国 公立大学 录取政策 变革与未来 the United States public universities admission policy change and future
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献31

  • 1韩萌.美国公立大学应对金融危机的策略、特征及其启示[J].高等教育研究,2014,35(12):95-102. 被引量:2
  • 2茹宁.外包:西方大学提高管理效率的新工具[J].开放教育研究,2006,12(2):32-34. 被引量:3
  • 3[美]约翰·E·丘伯 泰力·M·默 蒋衡等译.政治、市场和学校[M].北京:教育科学出版社,2003.5.
  • 4[美]D.B.约翰斯通.高等教育财政:问题与出路[M].北京:人民教育出版社,2004.
  • 5C. L. Horn, S.M. Flores, Percent plans in college admissions : A comparative analysis of three states" experiences. Harvard Civil Right Project, Cambridge, MA. Ford Foundation, NY. 2003.
  • 6Hendrickson, R. “Rethinking affirmative action: Redefining compelling state interest and merit in admission,” eabody Journal of Education 76(2001) : 117--135.
  • 7Holley, D. Spencer, D. "The Texas ten percent plan," Harvard Civil Rights--Civil Liberties Lava Review 34 (1999):1--33.
  • 8C. L. Horn, & S.M. Flores, Percent plans in college admissions : A comparative analysis of three states" experiences. Harvard Civil Right Project, Cambridge, MA. Ford Foundation, NY. 2003.
  • 9Thompson, J. Tobias, S. "The Texas ten percent plan," American Behavioral Scientist43(2000) :1121--1138.
  • 10Gorman, S. "The 4 percent solution," The National Journal, 19(1999) :774--775.

共引文献15

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部