期刊文献+

术前短程放疗与长程放化疗对局部进展期直肠癌患者长期生活质量的影响 被引量:8

Effects of Preoperative Short-course Radiotherapy and Long-course Radiochemotherapy on Long-term Quality of Life in Patients with Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨术前短程放疗与长程放化疗对局部进展期直肠癌(LARC)患者长期生活质量的影响。方法纳入经术前新辅助放疗或放化疗且术后随访3年以上处于无病生存状态的LARC患者55例,根据术前新辅助治疗的方式,分为短程放疗组(n=20)和长程放化疗组(n=35)。短程放疗组术前采用短程快速大分割放疗,总放射剂量25. 0Gy,剂量分割5. 0 Gy×5次;长程放化疗组术前采用常规分割放疗,总放射剂量45. 0~50. 4 Gy,剂量分割1. 8~2. 0 Gy×23~28次,同步化疗采用5-Fu或希罗达为基础的方案。采用生活质量核心评定量表(QLQ-C30)评估术后长期生活质量状态。结果短程放疗组和长程放化疗组在QLQ-C30量表总体健康评分(74. 8±15. 2 vs 76. 5±17. 6),躯体(82. 6±16. 7 vs 83. 9±14. 0)、角色(75. 3±16. 5 vs 77. 8±15. 9)、情绪(78. 6±18. 5 vs 80. 2±19. 1)、认知(80. 6±17. 5 vs 83. 4±16. 9)和社会功能(76. 8±16. 4 vs 78. 1±16. 6) 5个领域评分,疲劳(23. 5±7. 4 vs 25. 6±8. 0)、恶心呕吐(2. 8±1. 8 vs4. 2±2. 9)、疼痛(12. 8±10. 2 vs 11. 7±9. 5)、气促(15. 6±11. 3 vs 16. 3±10. 9)、失眠(20. 5±12. 6 vs 21. 7±12. 5)、食欲减退(6. 8±4. 9 vs 8. 5±5. 8)、便秘(10. 5±5. 9 vs 8. 2±4. 3)、腹泻(13. 2±6. 1 vs 10. 7±7. 2)和经济困难(10. 6±6. 9 vs13. 8±7. 5) 9个症状评分方面,差异均无统计学意义(P均> 0. 05)。结论术前短程放疗和长程放化疗对LARC患者长期生活质量的影响可能并无明显差别。 Objective To investigate the effect of preoperative short-course radiotherapy(SC-RT) and long-course radiochemotherapy(LC-RCHT) on the long-term quality of life in locally advanced rectal cancer(LARC) patients. Methods 55 patients with LARC treated with neoadjuvant radiotherapy or radiochemotherapy,who had disease-free survival in the follow-up for more than 3 years,were enrolled in this study.According to the form of neoadjuvant radiotherapy,the patients were divided into SC-RT group( n =20) and LC-RCHT group( n =35).SC-RT group were treated with neoadjuvant radiotherapy with a total radiation dose 25.0 Gy(5.0 Gy×5).LC-RCHT group were given neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy with a total radiation dose of 45~50.4 Gy(1.8~2.0 Gy×23~28) concomitant with 5-FU or capecitabine based chemotherapy.The QLQ-C30 was used to assess the long-term quality of life in both groups. Results No differences were observed in QLQ-C30 scale score between SC-RT and LC-RCHT group( P〉0.05),including the global health status(74.8±15.2 vs 76.5±17.6),the 5 functional scales of physical functioning(82.6±16.7 vs 83.9±14.0),role functioning(75.3±16.5 vs 77.8±15.9),emotional functioning(78.6±18.5 vs 80.2±19.1),cognitive functioning(80.6±17.5 vs 83.4±16.9),and social functioning(76.8±16.4 vs 78.1±16.6),and the 9 symptom items of fatigue(23.5±7.4 vs 25.6±8.0),nausea and vomiting(2.8±1.8 vs 4.2±2.9),pain symptoms(12.8±10.2 vs 11.7±9.5),dyspnoea(15.6±11.3 vs 16.3±10.9),insomnia(20.5±12.6 vs 21.7±12.5),appetite loss(6.8±4.9 vs 8.5±5.8),constipation(10.5±5.9 vs 8.2±4.3),diarrhea(13.2±6.1 vs 10.7±7.2),and financial difficulties(10.6±6.9 vs 13.8±7.5). Conclusion There is no significant difference in the effect of preoperative short-course radiotherapy and preoperative long-course radiochemotherapy on long-term quality of life in patients with LARC.
作者 栗国 刘建仁 傅志超 冯静 曾国沐 程惠华 LI Guo;LIU Jianren;FU Zhichao(Fuzhou General Hospital of PLA,Fuzhou,35002)
出处 《实用癌症杂志》 2018年第10期1600-1603,1613,共5页 The Practical Journal of Cancer
基金 福建省自然科学基金项目(编号:2017J01222)
关键词 局部进展期直肠癌 新辅助治疗 短程放疗 长程放化疗 Locally advanced rectal cancer Neoadjuvant Short-course radiotherapy Long-course radiochemotherapy
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献20

  • 1Monson JR, Weiser MR, Buie WD, et al. Practice parameters for the management of rectal cancer (revised)[J]. Dis Colon Rectum, 2013, 56(5):535-550.
  • 2Sebag-Montcfiore D, Stephens RJ, Steele R, et al. Preoperative radiotherapy versus selective postoperative chemoradiotherapy in patients with rectal cancer (MRC CR07 and NCIC-CTG CO16):a multicentre, randomised trial[J]. Lancet, 2009, 373(9666):811-820.
  • 3Bosset JF, Collette L, Calais G, et al. Chemotherapy with preoperative radiotherapy in rectal cancer[J]. N Engl J Med, 2006, 355(11):1114- 1123.
  • 4Birgisson H, Phhlman L, Gunnarsson U, et al. Adverse effects of preoperative radiation therapy for rectal cancer: long-term follow- up of the Swedish Rectal Cancer Trial[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2005, 23(34):8697 - 8705.
  • 5Wong RK, Tnadan V, De Silva S, et al. Pre-operative radiotherapy and curative surgery for the management of localized rectal carcinoma[J]. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2007, CD002102.
  • 6Aaronson NK, Ahmedzai S, Bergman B, et al. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: a quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology[J]. J Natl Cancer Inst, 1993, 85(5):365-376.
  • 7Gujral S, Conroy T, Fleissner C, et al. Assessing quality of life in patients with colorectal cancer: an update of the EORTC quality of life questionnaire[J]. Eur J Cancer, 2007, 43(10):1564-1573.
  • 8Hohenberger W, Merkel S, Matzel K, et al. The influence of abdomino-peranal (intersphincteric) resection of lower third rectal carcinoma on the rates of sphincter preservation and locoregional recurrence[J]. Colorectal Dis, 2006, 8(1):23-33.
  • 9Rullier E, Laurent C, Bmtagnol F, et al. Sphincter-saving resection for all rectal carcinomas: the end of the 2-em distal rule[J]. Ann Surg, 2005, 241 (3):465-469.
  • 10Bonadeo FA, Vaccaro CA, Benati ML, et al. Rectal cancer: local recurrence after surgery without radiotherapy[J]. Dis Colon Rectum, 2001, 44(3):374-379.

共引文献143

同被引文献82

引证文献8

二级引证文献15

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部