摘要
执行和解的效力直接决定执行和解的运行,民事诉讼法未对执行和解效力进行界分,应否赋予执行和解以强制执行力学界未有定论。通过对执行和解性质的界分,执行和解性质为不可诉的私法行为,执行和解的效力应当具有不可诉的合同效力,故其不应具有强制执行力,我国《合同法》《民事诉讼法》应当作出相应修改。
The effect of the implementation of conciliation directly decides the operation of the conciliation.The civil procedure law does not demarcate the effect of the implementation of the settlement. By defining the boundary of the nature of the execution reconciliation, this article holds that the nature of the execution reconciliation is an private law behavior and the effect of the execution reconciliation shall not be contract effect Therefore, it should not have compulsory execution. China' s Contract Law and the Code of Civil Procedure Law shall be amended accordingly.
作者
丁朋超
Ding Peng-chao(School of Law,Fudan University,Shanghai 200438,China)
出处
《政法学刊》
2018年第3期5-9,共5页
Journal of Political Science and Law
基金
中国法学会2016年度部级法学研究课题"审判团队模式实证研究"[(CLS(2016)Y05]
四川省高等学校人文社会科学重点研究基地-基层司法能力研究中心(重点)研究课题"审判组合模式研究"(JCSF2017-02)
关键词
执行和解
强制执行力
合同效力
implementation of reconciliation
enforcement force
effect of contract
legislation perfection