期刊文献+

中国护理临床实践指南质量评价标准的构建 被引量:11

Establishment of quality criteria for clinical nursing practice guidelines in China
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的制订我国护理临床实践指南的质量评价标准。方法采用团体焦点访谈法对全国26名临床护理专家和循证方法学专家进行两轮访谈以确定我国护理领域临床实践指南的质量评价标准。结果制订了我国护理领域临床实践指南的质量评价标准:涵盖五个维度,即科学性/严谨性、有效性/安全性、经济性、可用性/可行性、指南制订过程的利益冲突,包括15个条目,每个条目均采用0~5分制进行评分。依据不同条目对指南质量的影响不同,确定各条目权重为0.5~2,并对每个条目的评分标准进行了详细解读。结论我国护理领域临床实践指南质量评价标准既确保了与医疗领域指南质量评价标准在框架上的一致性,又充分考虑了护理学科特点,为提高我国护理临床实践指南的质量提供了标准和依据。 Objectives To establish the quality criteria for clinical nursing practice guidelines in China. Methods Two focus groups' interviews for 26 clinical nursing experts and methodological experts from China were adopted to build the quality criteria for clinical nursing practice guidelines. Results The quality criteria for clinical nursing practice guidelines in China covered 5 domains and 15 items, which included scientificity/rigor, effectiveness/safety, economy, availability/feasibility, and conflict of interest. All items were from 0 to 5 scale and weighted 0.5 to 2 based on their contributions to the quality of guidelines. Conclusions The quality criteria for clinical nursing practice guidelines adopt the same framework with the quality criteria of guidelines in medical field and also integrate features of nursing. It provides the quality standard for Chinese clinical nursing practice guidelines.
作者 周英凤 王强 胡雁 邢唯杰 黄超 林炜炜 ZHOU Yingfeng;WANG Qiang;HU Yah;XlNG Weijie;HUNANG Chao;LIN Weiwei(School of Nursing,Fudan University;Centre for Joanna Briggs Institute Centre of Excellence of Evidence-based Nursing,Fudan Universit;Shanghai Evidence-based Nursing Center,Shanghai,200032,P.R.China;2.National Center for Medical Service Administration,National Health Commission,Beijing,100044,P.R.China)
出处 《中国循证医学杂志》 CSCD 北大核心 2018年第9期990-994,共5页 Chinese Journal of Evidence-based Medicine
关键词 临床实践指南 循证护理 质量评价标准 中国 Clinical practice guideline Evidence-based nursing Quality criteria China
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献43

  • 1刘鸣.临床实践指南意义、建立方法和评价[J].中国卒中杂志,2006,1(1):33-36. 被引量:19
  • 2胡雁.用循证护理的观念评估“临床实践指南”[J].护士进修杂志,2005,20(4):309-311. 被引量:55
  • 3David W. Stewart. Focus Group: Theory and Practice.California: Sage Publications,Inc., 1990
  • 4Thomas L. Greenbaum.The Handbook for Focus Group Research (Second Edition).California: Sage Publications,Inc.,1998
  • 5詹思延.临床指南研究与评价工具简介[J].中国循证儿科杂志,2007,2(5):375-377. 被引量:45
  • 6Field MJ,Lohr KN. Guidelines for clinical practice:from development to use[M]. Washington DC:National Academy Press, 1992.
  • 7Cooper MJ,Zlotkin SH. An evidence-based approach to the development of national dietary guidelines. J Am Diet Assoc,2003,103(12 Suppl 2):$28-33.
  • 8National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Published clinical guidelines[EB/OL]. (2013-07-03)[2013-07-05]. http://guidance.nice.org.uk/CG/Published.
  • 9Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network. Clinical guidelines-numerical list[EB/OL]. [2013-07-05]. http://www. sign.ac.uk/guidelines/published/index.html#.
  • 10National Guideline Clearinghouse. Guideline index[EB/OL]. [2013-07-05]. http://www.guideline.gov/browse/index. aspx?alpha=A.

共引文献129

同被引文献131

引证文献11

二级引证文献50

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部