期刊文献+

大学学术评价指标体系重构研究——基于2015年ARWU、QS和THE学术评价相关性分析 被引量:2

Research on the Reconstruction of University Academic Evaluation Index System——Based on correlation analyses of the academic evaluation of ARWU,QS and THE in 2015
下载PDF
导出
摘要 ARWU、THE和QS是世界最有影响的三大大学排名体系。以三者提供的数据为素材分析肯德尔和谐系数和皮尔逊相关性发现,三者评分信度和效度都较高。同时,三者学术评价也存在一定问题:决定系数分析显示,三者评分的效度很低;同一大学被不同评价体系评得的学术等级相差较大;入围三种排名榜单的大学数量偏少。产生问题的主要原因是计算方法上的不同导致评价的一致性不高和排名指标不同导致排名结果差异。要采取有效对策克服ARWU、THE和QS存在的不足:修正已有大学学术评价指标体系部分指标和构建更科学的大学学术评价指标体系。 ARWU,THE and QS are the most influential three university ranking systems in the world.According to the data provided by the three,the Kendall harmony coefficient and Pearson relevance were analyzed.The results show that the scores of the three were both high in reliability and validity.At the same time,there are some problems in the academic evaluation of the three:The coefficient analysis reveals that the validity of the three is very low;there is a great difference among the academic grade of the same university rated by different evaluation systems;the number of universities in three ranking lists is less.The main reasons for the problems are that the difference in calculation method leads to the poor consistency of the evaluation and the difference of the ranking index leads to the difference of the ranking results.It is necessary to take effective measures to overcome the shortcomings of ARWU,THE and QS to revise some the existing indexes of the university academic evaluation index system and to reconstruct a more scientific university academic evaluation index system.
作者 刘磊 Liu Lei(Research Institute of Education Science,Huang Zhong University of Science and Technology,Wuhan 430074,China)
出处 《教育科学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2018年第3期39-47,共9页 Education Science
关键词 学术评价指标体系 重构 ARWU THE QS the index system of academic evaluation reconstruction ARWU THE QS
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献102

共引文献49

同被引文献31

二级引证文献15

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部