期刊文献+

多维互动模式对二语词汇习得的影响 被引量:13

The Effect of Multi-Dimensional Interaction on L2Vocabulary Acquisition
原文传递
导出
摘要 本文基于协同理论,依托读后续写任务,考察学习者和任务、不同水平同伴、多媒体工具多维互动对协同量及二语词汇学习的影响。三个实验组(低-低水平组、高-低水平组、低-低水平加多媒体辅助组)被要求在读后续写任务中使用目标词并接受词汇测试,其中10名受试自愿接受访谈并汇报其词汇记忆策略。结果发现,学习者跟不同水平同伴互动时互动强度有差异;互动强度对作文产出中的词汇协同及短语协同有显著影响,对句子协同没有显著影响;同伴互动强度对学习者接受性、产出性词汇知识习得有显著影响,但多媒体多维互动对词汇学习作用有限;学习者主要通过高频接触、构建情景模型、创造性运用词汇策略来记忆单词。 Based on the alignment theory, this paper examines the effects of L2 learners' interactions with learning tasks, peers of different proficiency levels, and multi-media tools on alignment magnitude and L2 vocabulary learning. Three experimental groups were required to incorporate the target words in a continuation task and then take vocabulary posttests, and ten participants volunteered to take part in an interview about their vocabulary learning strategies. The results indicated that: (1) learners' interaction with peers of different proficiency levels induced differing levels of interactional intensity; (2) peer interactional intensity had significant effect on lexical and phrasal alignment, but not on sentential alignment; (3) peer interactional intensity had significant effect on learners' receptive and productive lexical knowledge, but the interaction with multi-media exerted very limited effect; and (4) learners mainly relied on high-frequency exposure to the target words, constructing situation models and applying target words creatively as their vocabulary learning strategies.
作者 周晓 ZHOU Xiao(Guangdong University of Technolog)
机构地区 广东工业大学
出处 《现代外语》 CSSCI 北大核心 2018年第5期647-660,共14页 Modern Foreign Languages
基金 国家哲学社会科学基金青年项目"频率分布和二语构式习得有效路径研究"(15CYY018)的阶段性成果
关键词 多维互动 同伴互动强度 协同 二语词汇习得 multi-dimensional interaction peer interactional intensity alignment L2 vocabulary acquisition
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献34

  • 1Bock, K. 1986. Syntactic persistence in language production [J]. Cognitive Psychology 18: 355-387.
  • 2Bock, K. 1989. Closed-class immanence in sentence production [J]. Cognition 31: 163-186.
  • 3Bock, K. &H. LoebeU. 1990. Framing sentences [J]. Cognition 35: 1-39.
  • 4Boyland, J. &J. Anderson. 1998. Evidence that syntactic priming is long-lasting [A]. In M. Gernsbacher (ed.). Proceedings of the 20 th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society [C]. Mahwah, N.J... Erlbaum. 1205.
  • 5Branigan, H., M. Pickering & A. Cleland. 2000. Syntactic co-ordination in dialogue [J]. Cognition 75: B13-B25.
  • 6Cleland, A. & M. Pickering. 2003. The use of lexical and syntactic information in language production: Evidence from the priming of noun-phrase structure [J]. Journal of Memory and Language 49 : 214-230.
  • 7Ferreira, V. 2003. The persistence of optional complementizer production: Why saying "that" is not saying "that" at all [J]. Journal of Memory and Language 48: 379-398.
  • 8Grass, s. zoo3, Input and interaction LA_I; In C. Douglaty&M. Long (eds.). Hanalngook t Second Language Acquisition [C]. Oxford: Blackwell. 224-255.
  • 9Gass, S. &L. Selinker. 2008. Second Language Acquisition: An Introductory Course (3rd edition) [M]. New York.. Routledge.
  • 10Hartsuiker, R. &H. Kolk. 1998. Syntactic persistence in Dutch [J]. Language and Speech 41 : 143-184.

共引文献89

同被引文献151

引证文献13

二级引证文献27

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部