期刊文献+

康德哲学视点下人工智能生成物的著作权问题探讨 被引量:111

Discussion on the Copyright of Artificial Intelligence Products under the Perspective of Kant's Philosophy
原文传递
导出
摘要 康德"主客体统一认识论"和"人是目的"哲学视点下,无论人工智能发展到何种阶段,都只能作为人利用的客体和工具处理,而不能将其拟制为与人享有平等地位的法律主体。以此为前提,人工智能生成物应当作为人利用人工智能创作的作品并按照现行著作权法关于作品的构成要件判断其独创性。在人工智能生成物构成作品的情况下,应按照现行著作权法关于著作权归属的原则处理其权利归属,即人工智能生成物的著作权原则上归属于利用人工智能进行作品创作的作者(自然人或者法人或者非法人单位),例外情况下属于雇主或者委托人。 From the point of view of Kant's philosophy of unified epistemology of subject and object and man is the purpose,artificial intelligence can only be treated as object and tool used by human beings,but not as the legal subject in equal status with human beings in any developing stages. On the basis of this,artificial intelligence products should be seen as woks which human beings create by using artificial intelligence as a tool,and their originality should be judged according to the stipulations of the constitutive requirements of works in existing copyright law. In the case that artificial intelligence products constitute works,the ownership of copyright of products should be dealt with in accordance with the stipulations of it in the existing copyright law.Namely,the copyright of artificial intelligence products normally belongs to the people who use the artificial intelligence to produce the works( natural person or legal person or entity without legal personality),and belongs to the employer or the commissioning party in exceptional cases.
作者 李扬 李晓宇 Li Yang;Li Xiaoyu
机构地区 中山大学法学院
出处 《法学杂志》 CSSCI 北大核心 2018年第9期43-54,共12页 Law Science Magazine
关键词 康德哲学 人工智能生成物 主体资格 法律属性 权利分配 Kant' s Philosophy artificial intelligence products subject qualification legal attributes right allocation
  • 相关文献

参考文献31

二级参考文献298

共引文献2101

同被引文献1053

引证文献111

二级引证文献851

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部