摘要
目的 了解自身免疫性溶血性贫血(AIHA)/Evans综合征(ES)患者外周血CD4^+CD69^+T细胞的临床意义.方法 选取2015年10月至2016年5月于天津医科大学总医院血液科住院的AIHA/ES患者32例,其中溶血发作组15例,缓解组17例;健康对照13名.以流式细胞仪检测外周血CD69^+T细胞;实时定量PCR检测外周血CD4^+T细胞中CD69 mRNA表达水平;酶联免疫吸附试验(ELISA)检测血浆CD69浓度.结果 (1)溶血发作组的CD3^+CD69^+/CD3^+T细胞比例高于缓解组[(3.08±1.48)%比(1.96±1.33)%,P<0.05]和健康对照组[(1.28±0.83)%,P<0.01];溶血发作组CD3^+CD69^+T细胞绝对值高于健康对照组[(2.94±1.81)× 10^7/L比(1.48± 1.42)× 10^7/L,P<0.05].(2)溶血发作组CD3^+CD4^+CD69^+/CD3^+CD4^+T细胞比例高于缓解组[(2.16±1.56)%比(1.16±0.62)%,P<0.05]及健康对照组[(0.94±0.78)%,P<0.05];溶血发作组CD3^+CD4^+CD69^+T细胞绝对值高于健康对照组[(1.04±0.98)× 10^7/L比(0.44±0.38)× 10^7/L,P<0.05].(3)溶血发作组CD3^+CDs+CD69^+/CD3^+CD8^+T细胞比例高于健康对照组[(4.87±2.56)%比(1.83±1.27)%,P<0.01];但CD3^+CD8^+CD69^+T细胞绝对值在3组间差异无统计学意义.(4) Pearson相关分析显示,溶血发作组CD3^+CD4^+CD69^+/CD3^+CD4^+T细胞比例与血红蛋白浓度呈负相关(P.<0.01),与总胆红素以及间接胆红素均呈正相关(P均<0.01),与网织红细胞比例呈正相关(P=0.01);缓解组CD3^+CD4^+CD69^+/CD3^+CD4^+T细胞比例与血红蛋白浓度呈负相关(P<0.05).(5)溶血发作组CD4^+T细胞中CD69mRNA的相对表达水平显著高于缓解组(32.26±35.11比6.05±5.87,P<0.05)及健康对照组(1.76±1.85,P<0.01),缓解组高于健康对照组(P<0.05).(6)溶血发作组患者血浆CD69水平高于健康对照组[(494.21±16.06) ng/L比(441.39±104.6) ng/L,P<0.05].结论 AIHA/ES患者外周血CD69^+T细胞比例增高,以CD4^+CD69^+T细胞增高为主,且与AIHA/ES的疾病严重程度相关.
Objective To investigate the significant of peripheral CD4^+CD69^+T lymphocytes in patients with autoimmune hemolytic anemia (AIHA)/Evans syndrome (ES).Methods In this study peripheral blood samples from 32 patients with AIHA/ES (15 hemolytic episode patients,17 remission patients) and 13 healthy controls were collected.Patients with AIHA/ES were recruited in Tianjin Medical University General Hospital from October 2015 to May 2016.The percentages of CD69^+ T lymphocytes were analyzed by flow cytometry.The expression of CD69 mRNA in CD4^+T lymphocytes which was sorted from peripheral blood by magnetic activated cell sorting (MACS) was detected using real-time PCR.Soluable CD69 was measured by ELISA.Results In hemolytic episode patients,the ratio of CD3^+CD69^+/CD3^+T lymphocytes [(3.08 ± 1.48)%] was significantly higher than that in healthy controls [(1.28 ± 0.83)%,P〈0.01] and in remission group[(1.96± 1.33)%,P〈0.05].The absolute count of CD3^+CD69^+T lymphocytes in hemolytic episode group [(2.94± 1.81)× 10^7/L] was higher than that in healthy controls [(1.48± 1.42)× 10^7/L,P〈0.05].The ratio of CD3^+CD4^+CD69^+/CD3^+CD4^+T cells in hemolytic episode group [(2.16± 1.56)%] was significantly higher than that in remission group [(1.16±0.62)%,P〈0.05] and healthy controls[(0.94±0.78)%,P〈0.05].The quantity of CD3^+CD4^+CD69^+T lymphocytes in hemolytic episode group[(1.04±0.98)× 10^7/L] was higher than in healthy controls [(0.44± 0.38) × 10^7 / L,P〈0.05].The ratio of CD3^+CD8^+CD69^+/CD3^+ CD8^+T lymphocyte in hemolytic episode group [(4.87±2.56)%] was significantly higher than that in healthy controls[(1.83± 1.27)%,P〈0.01].The quantity of CD3^+CDs+CD69^+T lymphocytes in three groups did not show significant difference.The ratio of CD3^+CD4^+CD69^+/CD3^+CD4^+T lymphocytes in hemolytic episode group was negatively correlated with hemoglobin (Hb) (P〈0.01),positively correlated with the percentage of reticulocytes (Ret%)(P=0.01)total bilirubin(TBil),indirect bilirubin(IBil) (P〈0.01) and not correlated with absolute reticulocytes count,lactic dehydrogenase (LDH),complement 3(C3),complement 4 (C4).The ratio of CD3^+CD4^+CD69^+/CD3^+CD4^+T lymphocytes in remission group was negatively correlated with Hb (P〈0.05).In hemolytic episode patients CD69 mRNA (32.26±35.11) was significantly higher than that in remission group(6.05±5.87)(P〈0.05)and healthy controls (1.76± 1.85)(P〈0.01).CD69 mRNA in remission group was significantly higher than healthy controls (P〈0.05).Serum CD69 in hemolytic episode patients [(494.21 ± 16.06) ng/L] was significantly higher than that in healthy controls [(441.39± 104.6) ng/L,P〈0.05].Conclusion Our findings suggest that the proportion of CD4^+CD69^+ T lymphocytes increase in AIHA/ES patients,which is correlated with the severity of disease.
作者
邢莉民
徐文艳
段宁宁
曲莹莹
刘召云
邵宗鸿
Xing Limin;Xu Wenyan;Duan Ningning;Qu Yingying;Liu Zhaoyun;Shao Zonghong(Department of Hematology,Tianjin Medical University General Hospital,Tianfin 300052,China)
出处
《中华内科杂志》
CAS
CSCD
北大核心
2018年第9期656-660,共5页
Chinese Journal of Internal Medicine
基金
天津市应用基础与前沿技术研究计划(15JCYBJC27300)