期刊文献+

用两种直肠全系膜切除手术治疗直肠癌的效果对比

Comparison of the efficacy of total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:比较用腹腔镜下直肠全系膜切除手术和传统开腹直肠全系膜切除手术治疗直肠癌的效果。方法:按照手术方式的不同将皖南医学院弋矶山医院收治的84例直肠癌患者分为腹腔镜组和开腹组,每组各有42例患者。对腹腔镜组患者进行腹腔镜下直肠全系膜切除手术,对开腹组患者进行传统开腹直肠全系膜切除手术。然后比较两组患者手术的效果。结果:腹腔镜组患者手术中的出血量少于开腹组患者(P<0.05),其术毕至排气的时间及住院的时间均短于开腹组患者(P<0.05),其手术后并发症的发生率低于开腹组患者(P<0.05)。结论:与用开腹直肠全系膜切除手术治疗直肠癌的效果相比,用腹腔镜下直肠全系膜切除手术治疗直肠癌的效果更为理想。 objective: to compare the efficacy of laparoscopic total mesorectal resection and traditional open total mesorectal resection for rectal cancer. Methods: according to different surgical methods, 84 cases of rectal cancer patients admitted by wannan medical college in yijishan hospital were divided into laparoscopic group and open group, with 42 patients in each group. The laparoscopic total mesorectal resection was performed on patients in the laparoscopic group, and the laparoscopic total mesorectal resection was performed on patients in the open group. The results were then compared between the two groups. Results: the amount of bleeding in the laparoscopic surgery was less than that in the open surgery group(P〈0.05), and the time of exhaust and hospitalization was shorter than that in the open surgery group(P〈0.05), and the incidence of postoperative complications was lower than that in the open surgery group(P〈0.05). Conclusion: compared with the effect of laparoscopic total mesorectal resection for rectal cancer, laparoscopic total mesorectal resection for rectal cancer is more effective.
作者 王亮 张义胜 徐华平 Wang Liang;Zhang Yisheng;Xu Huaping(Wannan medical college wanyishan hospital,Wuhu Anhui 241001)
出处 《当代医药论丛》 2018年第16期82-84,共3页
关键词 直肠癌 腹腔镜下直肠全系膜切除手术 传统直肠全系膜切除手术 rectal cancer Laparoscopic total mesorectal resection Traditional total mesorectal resection
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献77

  • 1陆少美,张自顺,颜南生,张同琳,张能维,李强,任燕.腹腔镜下腹会阴联合直肠癌根治术──附7例报告[J].北京医科大学学报,1995,27(5):365-366. 被引量:9
  • 2Jemal A,Siegel R,Xu J,et al.Cancer statistics,2010[J].Ca Cancer J Clin,2010,60(5):277-300.
  • 3Ng SS,Leung KL,Lee JF,et al.Long-term moribidity and oncologic outcomes of laparoscopic-assisted anterior resection for upper rectal cancer:ten-year-results of a prospective,randomized trial[J].Dis Colon Rectum,2009,52(4):558-566.
  • 4Lujan J,Valero G,Hernandez Q,et al.Randomized clinical trial comparing laparoscopic and open surgery in patients with rectal cancer[J].Br J Surg,2009,96(12):982-989.
  • 5Law WL,Poon JT,Fan JK,et al.Comparison of outcome of pen and laparscopic resection for stageⅡand stageⅢrectal cancer[J].Ann Surg Oncol,2009,16(6):1488-1493.
  • 6Kang SB,Park JW,Jeong SY,et al.Open versus laparoscopic surgery for mid or low rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy(COREAN trial):short-term outcomes of an open-label randomised controlled trial[J].Lancet Oncol,2010,11(7):637-645.
  • 7Jayne DG,Thorpe HC,Copeland J,et al.Five-year follow-up of the Medical Research Council CLASICC trial of laparoscopically assisted versus open surgery for colorectal cancer[J].Br J Surg,2010,97(11):1638-1645.
  • 8Liang X,Hou S,Liu H,et al.Effectiveness and safety of laparoscopic resection versus open surgery in patients with rectal cancer:a randomized,controlled trial from China[J].J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A,2011,21(5):381-385.
  • 9Baik SH,Gincherman M,Mutch MG,et al.Laparoscopic vs open resection for patients with rectal cancer:comparison of perioperative outcomes and long-term survival[J].Dis Colon Rectum,2011,54(1):6-14.
  • 10Biondo S,Ortiz H,Lujan J,et al.Quality of mesorectum after laparoscopic resection for rectal cancer results of an audited teaching programmer in Spain[J].Coloretal Dis,2010,12(1):24-31.

共引文献79

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部