期刊文献+

基于谈判的物流企业运输协同

Transportation Coordination of Logistics Enterprises Based on Negotiation
下载PDF
导出
摘要 随着物流运输量快速增长,越来越多的企业将协同运输作为降低成本、提高企业利润的重要策略,科学合理的合作利益分配方案是该策略成功实施的关键。针对该问题,考虑四种不同的利益分配方案—Nash谈判方案、MCRS、Shapley值以及Raiffa裁决方案,分析了各种方案的含义及特点,并给出了基于TOPSIS(逼近理想解的排序方法)的方案排序方法,并证明该方法能够获得较高的群体满意度,取得较好的协调效果。 With the rapid growth of the logistics transportation volume, more and more enterprises regard collaborative transportation as an important strategy to reduce costs and increase profits, and a scientific and reasonable cooperative benefit distribution scheme is the key to the successful implementation of this strategy. In this paper, four different benefit distribution schemes, namely the Nash negotiation scheme,MCRS, Shapley value and Raiffa ruling, are considered. The meaning and characteristics of each of them are analyzed, and a ranking is obtained based on TOPSIS. The result shows that the proposed method can achieve higher group satisfaction and better coordination effect.
作者 刘长贤 田厚平 Liu Changxian;Tian Houping(School of Management,Nanjing University of Posts & Telecommunications,Nanjing 210003;School of Economics & Management,Nanjing University of Technology,Nanjing 210094,China)
出处 《物流技术》 2018年第9期89-94,共6页 Logistics Technology
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(71402074 71472089) 教育部人文社会科学研究项目(13YJC630088) 江苏省高校哲学社会科学项目(2013SJB6300071) 中央高校基本科研业务费资助项目(30920130111011)
关键词 物流企业 协同运输 谈判 利益分配 TOPSIS logistics enterprise collaborative transportation negotiation distribution of benefits TOPSIS
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献45

  • 1艾凤义,侯光明.纵向研发合作中的收益分配和成本分担机制[J].中国管理科学,2004,12(6):86-90. 被引量:46
  • 2魏洁,李军.EPR下的逆向物流回收模式选择研究[J].中国管理科学,2005,13(6):18-22. 被引量:133
  • 3张连军.浅析我国食品冷藏物流的现状及对策[J].物流技术,2006,25(1):102-104. 被引量:20
  • 4龚树生,梁怀兰.生鲜食品的冷链物流网络研究[J].中国流通经济,2006,20(2):7-9. 被引量:76
  • 5Kaeprzzyk J, et al. A soft measure of consensts in the setting of partial preferences[J]. European Journal of Operational Research,1988, 34: 316-325.
  • 6Herrera F, et al. A model of consensus in group decision making under linguistic assessments[J]. F.S.S., 1996, 78:73- 87.
  • 7Herrera F, et al. Direct approach processes in group decision making using linguistic OWA operators[J]. F.S.S., 1996, 79:175-190.
  • 8Lee Huey-Ming. Group decision making using fuzzy sets theory for evaluating the rate of aggregation risk in software development[J]. F S S, 1996, 80: 261-271.
  • 9Teece D J. Competition, and innovation: Organization arrangement regimes of rapid technological progress[ J]. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 1992, (18): 1-25.
  • 10Bartos O J. Simple Model of Negotiation: A Sociological Point of View[M]. California: Sage Publications, 1978.

共引文献20

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部