期刊文献+

基于GMS的滨海油田输油管线地下水污染物预测 被引量:1

Goundwater pollution of pipe laying forecasts in coastal oil fields based on GMS
下载PDF
导出
摘要 运用地下水数值模拟技术,采用GMS中的MODFLOW模块建立地下水流场模型,MT3D模块建立地下水溶质运移模型,利用地下水实测流场与计算流场进行比较,率定含水层参数,并对建立的模型进行校正与识别。最后,预测滨海油田油井和输油管线在正常、输油管道破裂与老化腐蚀造成的原油泄漏等3种工况下,原油地下水污染物第10年内与20年内的时空分布特征及对周边村庄的影响。 Using groundwater numerical simulation technology,the groundwater flow field model was established by the MODFLOW module in the GMS. The MT3 D module established the groundwater solute transport model. The calculated water levels were compared with the observed ones from wells to reduce the model error through adjusting the model parameters,such as hydraulic conductivity. Finally,the temporal and spatial distribution characteristics of crude oil groundwater pollutants in the first 10 years and 20 years and the impact on the surrounding villages under the three conditions of normal and oil pipeline rupture and crude oil leakage caused by aging corrosion are predicted.
作者 陈毅 陕宁 杨峰 CHEN Yi;SHAN Ning;YANG Feng(Hainan Geological Comprehensive Survey and Design Institute,Haikou 570206,China;Hainan Provincial Geological Survey Ins titute,Haikou 570206,China)
出处 《水科学与工程技术》 2018年第5期33-36,共4页 Water Sciences and Engineering Technology
关键词 GMS 输油管线 地下水污染 预测 GMS pipe laying groundwater pollution toreeasts
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献26

  • 1束龙仓,刘佩贵,刘波,范晓梅,刘瑞国.傍河水源地数学模型的参数灵敏度分析——以辽宁省北票市某傍河水源地为例[J].工程勘察,2006,34(8):29-31. 被引量:23
  • 2束龙仓,王茂枚,刘瑞国,陈国浩.地下水数值模拟中的参数灵敏度分析[J].河海大学学报(自然科学版),2007,35(5):491-495. 被引量:70
  • 3Zheng C M,Bennet G D.Applied Contaminant Transport Modeling[M].New York:John Wiley&Sons,INC,2002.
  • 4Lenhart T,Eckhardt K.Comparison of Two Different Approaches of Sensitivity Analysis[J].Physics and Chemistry of the Earth,2002,27(3):645-655.
  • 5Saltelli A,Chan K,Scott M,et al.Sensitivity Analysis,Probability and Statistics Series[M].New York:John Wiley&Sons,2000:40-47.
  • 6Cvetkovic V.How Accurate is Predictive Modeling of Groundwater Transport?A Case Study of Advection,Macrodispersion,and Diffusive Mass Transfer at the Forsmark Site(Sweden)[J].Water Resources Research,2013,49:5317-5327.
  • 7Stothoff S A.Uncertainty and Variability of Infiltration at Yucca Mountain:Part 2.Model Results and Corroboration[J].Water Resources Research,2013,49:3804-3824.
  • 8Mckay M D,Beckman R J,Cconober W J.A Comparison of Three Methods for Selecting Values of Input Variables in the Analysis of Output from a Computer Code[J].Technometics,1979,21(4):239-245.
  • 9Morris M D.Factorial Sampling Plans for Preliminary Computational Experiments[J].Technometrics,1991,33(2):159-172.
  • 10Sobol’I M.Sensitivity Estimates for Nonlinear Mathematical Models[J].Mathematical Modeling Computational Experiments,1993,1(4):407-414.

共引文献22

同被引文献2

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部