《环境与职业医学》杂志第六届编委会第一次全体大会会议纪要

Minutes of First Plenary Session of Sixth Editorial Board of Journal of Environmental and Occupational Medicine

2018年8月19—21日,《环境与职业医学》杂志第六届编辑委员会第一次全体大会在上海召开。上海市新闻出版局报刊管理处、上海市卫生和计划生育委员会科教处和上海市期刊协会领导以及来自国内外的编委共80余人出席了此次会议。大会总结了第五届编委会及编辑部在提升期刊质量、拓展期刊影响、全面布局数字化业务、建设编委和编辑梯队等方面取得的一系列骄人的进步和成绩;宣读编委会章程及章程修改说明;介绍第六届编委会组建原则及构成;宣布第六届顾问委员会及编委会成员名单,并向编委代表颁发聘书。面对当前国内学术评价机制导致优秀稿源大量流失的困境,编委们根据吴凡主编提出的问题,主要包括:1)提升期刊评价指标;2)细稿计划和重点号;3)责任主编制度等方面展开了热烈讨论,提出了许多提高期刊水平的可行建议;编委们也积极响应,表示今后一定在组稿、审稿等工作中尽最大努力,为《环境与职业医学》的发展作出贡献。

The First Plenary Session of the Sixth Editorial Board of the Journal of Environmental and Occupational Medicine （JEOM） was held on August 19-21 2018 in Shanghai. Over 80 participants attended the meeting, including heads at Newspapers and Periodicals Management Office of Shanghai Municipal Press and Publication Bureau, Department of Science and Education of Shanghai Municipal Commission of Health and Family Planning, and Shanghai Periodicals Associations and domestic and overseas editorial board members. The meeting summarized the achievements made by the Fifth Editorial Board and the Editorial Office in the areas of improving journal quality, boosting journal influence, distributing digital business in a full-scale way, and constructing talent teams of editorial board members and editors; read the Regulations for JEOM Editorial Board （revised） and modification explanations; introduced the selection criteria and composition of the Sixth Editorial Boards; announced the list of the Sixth Editorial Board members and offered letters of appointment to them. Facing the difficulties that Chinese authors preferentially select high- prestige journals （mostly foreign journals） to publish their best research papers, Editor-in-chief Wu Fan gave her thoughts on the development of the journals, including 1） stepping up efforts to increase journal evaluation index; 2） making plans on solicited articles and featured issues; and 3） assigning editorial board members to each issue. Dr. Wu＇s thoughts sparked intense discussions on practical suggestions to improve journal quality and initiated positive responses from the members that they would actively contribute to the journal such as peer reviewing and commissioning articles. The meeting ended with many thoughtful suggestions.