期刊文献+

基于感知价值的车险投保群体识别及其匹配方案 被引量:1

Group Identification and Matching Schemes of Automobile Insurance Based on Perceived Value
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为解决车险产品的供需矛盾,依据感知水平划分车险投保群体,并利用问卷获得的数据对各类投保群体的行为特征及相关性进行实证分析。分析结果表明:车险投保人在感知利益和感知风险方面存在显著差异;高感知利益-高感知风险类群体占比最高,感知利益对此群体行为的影响高于感知风险,各观测变量对感知利益的影响强度依次是保险免责认知度、产品丰富程度、公司规模和产品满意度;投保时保费占月工资比例越高、购买第三者责任险限额越低的投保人,感知利益越高;购买险种越多的投保人,感知风险越高。最后对4类车险投保群体提出车险承保方案的匹配建议。 To solve the supply and demand contradiction of auto insurance products, automobile owner groups are divided based on the perceived difference, and the data obtained from the questionnaire is used to analyze the behavior characteristics and correlation of automobile owner groups. The results show that auto insurance insured have significant differences in perceived benefits and perceived risks; the group with high perceived benefits and high perceived risk accounts for the highest proportion, and perceived benefits on affecting group selection is more than perceived risk. The sequence of impact intensity of perceived benefit is insurance exemption awareness, product abundance degree, company size and product satisfaction; the higher the proportion of insurance premiums to monthly wages and the lower the liability limit of third-party insurance, the higher the perceived benefit is, and the more people who buy the number of insurance have, the higher the perceived risk is. Finally, the design suggestions on the matching schemes of auto insurance underwriting for 4 groups of groups are put forward.
作者 李方媛 赵长利 LI Fangyuan;ZHAO Changli(Institute of Automobile Insurance,Shandong Jiaotong University,Jinan 250357,China)
出处 《山东交通学院学报》 CAS 2018年第3期1-6,22,共7页 Journal of Shandong Jiaotong University
基金 山东省社会科学规划研究项目(15CJJJ20) 山东省软科学计划项目(2015RKB01442)
关键词 车险承保 群体识别 感知价值 结构方程模型 automobile insurance underwriting group identification perceived value structural equation model
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献96

  • 1周继腾.对保险公司差异化经营和差异化服务的思考[J].山西财经大学学报,2011,33(S1):77-77. 被引量:3
  • 2王耀军,杨华,张怀军.汽车维修企业服务质量的顾客满意度测评[J].天津工业大学学报,2005,24(3):74-76. 被引量:11
  • 3Ostrom A. and Iacobucci D. Consumer trade-offs and the evaluation of services[J]. Journal of Marketing, 1999,59 (January): 17-28.
  • 4Spiteri J. M. and Dion P. A. Customer value, overall satisfaction, end-user loyalty, and market performance in detail intensive industries[J]. Industrial Marketing Management, 2004,33:675-687.
  • 5Cronin J. R, Brady M. K. and Hult G T. Assessing the effects of quality, value, and customer satisfaction on consumer behavioral intentions in service environment[J]. Journal of Retailing, 2000,76(2) : 193-217.
  • 6Flint D. J., Woodruff R. B.and Gardial S F. Exploring the phenomenon of customer, desired value change in a business-to business context[J]. Journal of Marketing, 2002,66(10) : 102-117.
  • 7Anderson J. C.,Jain C. and Chintagunta P. K. Customer value assessment in business markets[J]. Journal of Business-to-Business Marketing, 1993,1(1 ) : 3 -30.
  • 8Sheth J. N.,Bruce I. and Newman. Why we buy what we buy: A theory of consumption values[J]. Journal of Business Research, 1991,22(4) : 159-170.
  • 9Giese J L. and Cote J A. Defining consumer satisfaction[J]. Academy of Marketing Science Review ,2000( 1 ) : 1-24.
  • 10Athanassopouloos A. Behavioral response to customer satisfaction: an empirical study[J]. European Journal of Marketing,2001,35(5/ 6) : 687-707.

共引文献292

同被引文献12

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部