期刊文献+

虚实结合挂线法对比传统实挂线法治疗复杂性肛瘘的临床效果分析 被引量:10

Clinical Analysis of the Combination of Virtual and Solid Combined with Hanging Line Method in the Treatment of Complicated Anal Fistula
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的对比虚实结合挂线法以及传统实挂线法应用于临床复杂性肛瘘患者的疗效。方法选取2015年1月—2016年12月期间在该院普外科进行住院治疗的复杂性肛瘘患者共68例,按照随机数字法分为两组,观察组采用虚实结合挂线法进行手术,对照组采用传统实挂线法进行手术,对比两组患者的术后预后情况,并对所有患者进行随访。结果观察组患者治愈36例,好转2例,未愈0例,治愈率为94.74%,对照组治愈27例,好转3例,未愈0例,治愈率为90.00%,两组比较差异无统计学意义(χ~2=0.552,P>0.05)。观察组在术后疼痛评分为(3.05±0.76)分,肛门功能评分为(0.92±0.41)分,明显优于对照组,差异有统计学意义(t=6.337、7.182,P<0.05)。结论虚实结合挂线法治疗复杂性肛瘘患者能减轻术后疼痛,更有效地保护肛门功能,有利于患者的预后。 Objective To compare the efficacy of virtual and solid combined hanging line method and traditional solid hanging line method in patients with clinical complex anal fistula. Methods A total of 68 patients with complicated anal fistula who underwent hospitalization in the hospital from January 2015 to December 2016 were enrolled. The patients were divided into two groups according to the random number method. The observation group was operated by virtual and solid combined with hanging line method. The control group was operated with the traditional suture method. The postoperative prognosis of the two groups was compared and all patients were followed up. Results In the observation group, 36 cases were cured, 2 cases were improved, 0 cases were unhealed, the cure rate was 94.74%, 27 cases were cured in the control group, 3 cases were improved, 0 cases were unhealed, and the cure rate was 90.00%. The difference was not statistically significant (χ2=0.552, P〉0.05). The postoperative pain score was (3.05±0.76)points, and the anal function score was (0.92±0.41)points, which was significantly better than the control group. The difference was statistically significant (t=6.337, 7.182, P〈0.05). Conclusion The combination of virtual and solid combined with hanging line method for the treatment of patients with complex anal fistula can relieve postoperative pain, more effectively protect the anal function, and benefit the prognosis of patients.
作者 鲁志臣 LU Zhi-chen(Department of Surgery,Baoying County Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine,Yangzhou,Jiangsu Province,225800 China)
出处 《系统医学》 2018年第17期101-103,共3页 Systems Medicine
关键词 传统实挂线法 虚实结合挂线法 复杂性肛瘘 Traditional solid hanging line method Virtual and solid combined hanging line method Complex anal fistula
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献40

  • 1Rojanasakul A, Pattanaarun J, Sahakitrungruang C, et al. Total anal sphincter saving technique for fistula-in-ano: the ligation of intersphincteric fistula tract [ J ]. J Med Assoc Thai, 2007,90 (3) :581-586.
  • 2Hong KD, Kang S, Kalaskar S, et al. Ligation of intersphincteric fistula tract(LIFT) to treat anal fistula: systematic review and meta-analysis [ J ]. Tech Coloproctol,2014,18 ( 8 ) : 685-691.
  • 3Lehmann JP,Graf W. Effieacy of LIFT for recurrent anal fistula [J]. Colorectal Dis,2013,15(5) : 592-595.
  • 4Woodforde JM, Merskey H. Some relationships between subjective measures of pain [ J]. J Psychosom Res, 1972, 16 (3) : 173-178.
  • 5Jorge JM, Wexner SD. Etiology and management of fecal incontinence[ J]. Dis Colon Rectum, 1993, 36(1 ) : 77-97.
  • 6Madbouly KM, E1 Shazly W, Abbas KS, et al. Ligation of intersphincteric fistula tract versus mucosal advancement flap in patients with high transsphincteric fistula-in-ano: a prospectiverandomized trial [ J]. Dis Colon Rectum, 2014, 57 (10) : 1202- 1208.
  • 7Sileri P, Giarratano G, Franceschilli L, et al. Ligation of the intersphincteric fistula tract (LIFT): a minimally invasive procedure for complex anal fistula: two-year results of a prospective muhicentric study [ J]. Surgical Innovation, 2014, 21(5) : 476-480.
  • 8Liu WY, Aboulian A, Kaji AH, et al. Long-term results of ligation of intersphincteric fistula tract(LIFT) for fistula-in-ano [J]. Dis Colon Rectum, 2013, 56(3): 343-347.
  • 9Attaallah W,Tuney D, Gulluoglu BM, et al. Should we consider topical silver nitrate irrigation as a definitive nonsurgical treatment for perianal fistula[ J] ? Dis Colon Rectum, 2014, 57 (7) : 882- 887.
  • 10van Koperen PJ,Bemelman WA, Gerhards MF, et al. The anal fistula plug treatment compared with the mueosal advancement flap for cryptoglandular high transsphineterie perianal fistula; a double-blinded multieenter randomized trial [ J ]. Dis Colon Rectum, 2011, 54(4);387-393.

共引文献153

同被引文献83

引证文献10

二级引证文献50

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部