摘要
通过检索近十年基于实证研究的语用评估文献进行系统评价,并将语用评估工具按标准化评估工具、非标准化评估工具进行分类,以了解国内语用评估工具的使用现状。研究结果表明,针对儿童语用的标准化和非标准化两种评估工具使用频率相当,但缺乏专门针对语用的标准化评估工具,且较多使用传统的、单一的评估方式。由此提出建议:开发针对语用的标准化评估工具,丰富语用评估方式;优化语用评估手段,加强传统与现代化评估技术的结合;标准化与非标准化评估相结合,综合评估儿童语言运用能力。
This study retrieves the pragmatic evaluation literature based on empirical research for nearly ten years,and classifies and systematically analyzes the evaluation tools used in the literature with standardized evaluation tools and non-standardized evaluation tools to understand the use of domestic pragmatic assessment tools. The results show that both the standardized and non-standardized assessment methods for children's pragmatic use are equally frequent,but most are traditional or single assessment methods while lack of standardized assessment tools for pragmatics. This article suggests developing standardized evaluation tools for pragmatics,enriching pragmatic assessment methods,optimizing pragmatic assessment tools,strengthening the combination of traditional and modern assessment techniques and combining standardized and non-standardized assessments to comprehensively assess children's language skills.
作者
龙艳林
李欢
LONG Yanlin ,LI Huan(Department of Special Education, Southwest University Chongqing 40071)
出处
《现代特殊教育》
2018年第8期33-43,共11页
Modern Special Education
基金
重庆市2016年教育科学规划重点课题"循证视阈下自闭症谱系障碍儿童社交干预研究"(课题编号:2016GX001)的阶段性成果
关键词
语言运用能力
标准化评估工具
非标准化评估工具
pragmatic development
standardized assessment tools
non-standardized assessment tools