期刊文献+

右美托咪定复合罗哌卡因行腹横肌平面阻滞对直肠癌术后快速康复的影响 被引量:18

Effect of Transversus Abdominis Plane Blocking by Dexmedetomidine Combined with Ropivacaine on Rapid Recovery in Postoperative Patients with Rectal Cancer
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的观察右美托咪定复合罗哌卡因行腹横肌平面阻滞对直肠癌患者术后快速康复的影响。方法选择2015年6月—2016年1月收治的实施择期腹腔镜直肠癌根治术的患者79例。随机分为观察组39例和对照组40例。观察组给予右美托咪定、罗哌卡因,对照组给予罗哌卡因。记录2组术后4、6、8、24、48 h静息、活动时的疼痛视觉模拟(VAS)评分和Ramsay评分,记录感觉阻滞维持时间、术后首次镇痛泵按压时间、术后24 h内有效按压次数和48 h内补救镇痛比例,离床活动时间、流食恢复时间、排气和排便时间、术后住院时间。结果观察组术后6、8 h静息和活动时VAS评分低于对照组(P <0. 05); 2组Ramsay评分比较差异无统计学意义(P> 0. 05)。观察组术后感觉阻滞维持时间、首次镇痛泵按压时间长于对照组,术后24 h内有效按压次数少于对照组,术后48 h内补救镇痛比例低于对照组(P <0. 05)。观察组离床活动时间、排气和排便时间、流食恢复时间早于对照组(P <0. 05)。观察组不良反应发生率低于对照组(P <0. 05),且观察组无右美托咪定相关不良反应。结论右美托咪定复合罗哌卡因行TAP阻滞,可优化术后镇痛效果,加速胃肠功能恢复,且不增加不良反应。 Objective To observe effect of transversus abdominis plane blocking by Dexmedetomidine combined with Ropivacaine on rapid recovery in postoperative patients with rectal cancer. Methods A total of 79 patients with selective laparoscopic radical resection of rectal carcinoma were randomly divided into observation group ( n = 39) and control group (n = 40). Observation group was treated with Dexmedetomidine and Ropivacaine, while control group was treated with Ropivacaine. In two groups, values of visual analogue scales (VAS) and Ramsay scores in postoperative 4th, 6th , 8th , 12th , 24th and 48th hours at rest and in activity were recorded, and maintaining time of feeling blocking, the first time of pressing analgesia pump, effective pressing numbers within postoperative 24 h, ratio of analgesic remediation within postoperative 48 h, ambulation time, starting time of eating liquid diet, exsufflation and defaecation times and postoperative hospitalization duration were recorded. Results VAS scores in 6th and 8th hours at rest and in activity in observation group were significantly lower than those in control group (P 〈 0.05). There was no significant difference in Ramsay score between two groups (P 〉 0.05). Compared with those in control group, in observation group, maintaining time of feeling blocking and the first time of pressing analgesia pmnp were significantly longer, and values of effective pressing numbers within postoperative 24 h and ratio of analgesic remediation wilhin postoperative 48 h were significantly lower (P 〈 0.05). Ambulation time, exsufflation and defaeeation times and starting time of eating liquid diet in observa- tion group were significantly earlier than those in control group (P 〈 0.05). Incidence rate of adverse reactions in obser- vation group was significantly lower than that in control group (P 〈 0.05). No related-Dexmedetomidine adverse reactions was found in observation group. Conclusion Transversus abdominis plane blocking by Dexmedetomidine combined with Ropivaeaine may optimize effect of postoperative analgesia and improve recovery of gastrointestinal function without increasing adverse reactions.
作者 王金保 张在旺 汤龙信 杨小民 WANG Jin-bao, ZHANG Zai-wang, TANG Long-xin, YANG Xiao-min(Department of Anaesthesia, Bethune Interna- tional Peace Hospital of PLA, Shijiazhuang 050082, China)
出处 《解放军医药杂志》 CAS 2018年第10期97-100,105,共5页 Medical & Pharmaceutical Journal of Chinese People’s Liberation Army
基金 河北省科技支撑计划项目(12277736) 河北省卫计委医学重点研究项目(ZL20140179)
关键词 直肠肿瘤 右美托咪定 罗哌卡因 麻醉 Rectal neoplasms Dexmedetomidine Ropivaeaine Anesthesia
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献63

  • 1张义长,朱耀民,赵新京,叶平安.不同浓度罗比卡因术后硬膜外镇痛效果的观察[J].临床麻醉学杂志,2005,21(2):103-104. 被引量:45
  • 2葛志军,戴体俊,曾因明.罗哌卡因在临床麻醉中的应用进展[J].国际麻醉学与复苏杂志,2006,27(2):103-105. 被引量:44
  • 3Eslamian L, Jalili Z, Jamal A, et al. Transversus abdominis plane block reduces postoperative pain intensity and analgesic consumption in elective cesarean delivery under general anes- thesia. J Anesth, 2012,26 ( 3 ) : 334-338.
  • 4Borglum J, Maschmann C, Belhage B, et al. Ultrasound- guided bilateral dual transversus abdominisplane block., a new four-point approach. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand, 2011,55 (6) : 658-663.
  • 5Bharti N, Kumar P, Bala I, et al. The efficacy of a novel ap- proach to transversus abdominis plane block for postoperative analgesia after colorectal surgery. Anesth Analg, 2011, 112 (6) :1504-1508.
  • 6Abdallah FW,Laffey JG, Halpern SH, et al. Duration of anal- gesic effectiveness after the posterior and lateral transversus abdominis plane block techniques for transverse lower abdomi- nal incisions: a meta-analysis. Br J Anaesth, 2013,111 (5) : 721- 735.
  • 7Raft AN. Abdominal field block: a new approach via the lumbar triangle. Anaesthesia, 2001,56(10) : 1024-1026.
  • 8Farooq M, Carey M. A case of liver trauma with a blunt re- gional anesthesia needle while performing transversus abdomi- nis plane block. Reg Anesth Pain Med, 2008, 33 (3): 274-275.
  • 9Griffiths JD, Barron FA, Grant S, et al. Plasma ropivacaine concen-trations after ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane block. Br J Anaesth, 2010,105(6) :853-856.
  • 10Cafiero T, Burrelli R, Latina P, et al. Analgesic transitioin after remifentanil-based anthesia in neurosurgery. A compari- son of sufentanil and tramdol. Minerva Anestesiol, 2004, 70 (1-2) :45-52.

共引文献500

同被引文献184

引证文献18

二级引证文献147

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部