摘要
司法人工智能有两条发展路径:初级司法人工智能和高级司法人工智能。初级的司法人工智能属于一种司法辅助工具,这是目前学界和实务对司法人工智能的一般定位。高级司法人工智能,即人工智能裁判。人工智能裁判是否可能构成司法人工智能的终极问题,有必要从三个方面综合分析。本体论在于回答何谓人工智能裁判,认识论在于回答人工智能裁判在技术上是否可能,价值论在于回答如果技术问题解决了,人工智能裁判是否应当。人工智能裁判能否实现在根本上取决于价值论是否允许。当然,也不宜将人工智能裁判在现阶段的困难性等同于最终的不可能性。
The artificial intelligence in trial exist two evolution trends:the primary judicial artificial intelligence and the advanced judicial artificial intelligence.Primary judicial artificial intelligence is a kind of auxiliary instrument for the judicial affairs.This is the general definition of the judicial artificial intelligence in the current academic and practical circles.The advanced judicial artificial intelligence is the situation where the case can be judged by the artificial intelligence system.The question that whether the advanced judicial artificial intelligence is possible consists the ultimate problem of judicial artificialintelligence,and our analyses should derive from three aspects.The ontological argument is to elucidate the concept of advanced judicial artificial intelligence and the epistemological argument is to elucidate whether does the advanced judicial artificial intelligence can be reached,and the axiological argument is to discuss that if the technical problems could be solved,whether should we let the trials to the artificial intelligence system.And then,it is not appropriate to equate the current difficulty of the advanced judicial artificial intelligence with its impossibility in the future.
出处
《国家检察官学院学报》
CSSCI
北大核心
2018年第5期16-31,共16页
Journal of National Prosecutors College
基金
四川大学法学院"研究阐释党的十九大精神"专项研究课题"新时代基于人工智能的司法裁判方式研究"(sculaw0413)的成果
关键词
人工智能
司法裁判
本体论
认识论
价值论
Artificial Intelligence
Judicial Judgment
Ontology
Epistemology
Axiology