人性化护理对双相情感障碍患者的效果

Effect of humanized nursing on patients with bipolar disorder

目的 :探讨人性化护理对双相情感障碍患者的效果。方法 :收集2016年1月至2017年1月收治的双向情感障碍患者60例,随机分为观察组和对照组各30例。对照组接受常规护理,观察组接受人性化护理,比较两组干预前后汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HAMD)、Bech-Rafaelsen躁狂量表(BRMS)和日常生活能力量表(ADL)评分,以及患者家属干预后对双相情感障碍相关知识的了解度。结果:观察组患者干预后HAMD、BRMS和ADL评分分别为(9.35±2.11)分、(2.65±0.66)分和(289.29±15.65)分,对照组分别为(12.77±2.38)分、(3.30±0.81)分和(253.38±15.11)分,组间差异有统计学意义(P <0.05)。观察组患者家属干预后对对双相情感障碍相关知识的了解度高于对照组(P <0.05)。结论:人性化护理可改善双相情感障碍患者的抑郁和躁狂状态,提高患者的生活质量和家属对相关知识的了解度,值得推荐应用。

Objective： To explore the efect of humanized nursing on patients with bipolar disorder. Methods： Sixty patients with bipolar disorder admitted from January 2016 to January 2017 were collected, and were randomly divided into an observation group and a control group with 30 cases each. The control group received routine nursing and the observation group received humanized nursing. The Hamilton depression rating scale（HAMD）, Bech-Rafaelsen mania scale（BRMS）, and activity of daily living scale（ADL） scores were compared between the two groups, and patients’ family members’ knowledge about bipolar disorder after intervention was understood. Results： The HAMD, BRMS and ADL scores of the observation group were （9.35±2.11）, （2.65±0.66） and （289.29±15.65）, respectively, those of the control group were （12.77±2.38）, （3.30±0.81） and （253.38±15.11）, respectively, and the diferences between the groups were statistically signifcant（P〈0.05）. After intervention, the family members of the observation group had a higher understanding of the knowledge related to bipolar disorder than those of the control group（P〈0.05）. Conclusion： Humanized nursing can improve the depression and manic state of patients with bipolar disorder, improve the quality of life of patients and the knowledge of family members, and it is worth for recommendation and application.