期刊文献+

腺瘤性大肠息肉切除术后肠镜随访时间间隔的比较观察 被引量:4

A comparative study of the time interval of enteroscopic follow-up after polypectomy
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的评估腺瘤性大肠息肉切除术后1年复查肠镜的必要性,分析影响息肉复发的相关因素。方法回顾性分析885例大肠腺瘤性息肉患者的病例资料,按照术后首次随访时间不同(0. 5年、1. 0年、1. 5年)分为A、B、C三个组,第二次随访的时间均为首次息肉切除术后的第3年,分析三组间首次与第二次肠镜监测下息肉复发率的差异及影响复发的因素。结果首次肠镜随访,A组息肉的复发率为4. 15%,B组的息肉复发率为18. 79%,C组的息肉复发率为21. 62%,A组与B组、C组比较,差异均有统计学意义(P <0. 01),B组与C组比较,差异无统计学意义(P> 0. 05)。第二次肠镜随访,A组息肉的复发率为39. 9%,B组的息肉复发率为26. 11%,C组的息肉复发率为25. 41%,A组与B组、C组比较,差异均有统计学意义(P <0. 01),B组与C组比较,差异无统计学意义(P> 0. 05)。结论建议大肠腺瘤性息肉切除术后进行肠镜初次监测的时间为1. 0~1. 5年,随后第二次肠镜随访的时间为首次息肉切除术后的第3年。 Objective To evaluate the necessity of colonoscopy follow-up at 1 year after polypectomy, and to analyze the potential influencing factors for recurrent polyps.Methods Retrospective analysis was performed on the clinical data of 885 patients with adenomatous colorectal polyps. Patients were devided into group A, B or C respectively depending on the time of initial postoperative follow-up (0.5, 1.0, or 1.5 years after polypetomy). The second follow-up was scheduled 3 years apart from the first follow-up for all the groups; the 3 groups were compared for the difference between the first and second follow-ups in the enteroscopic polyps recurrence rate, and the potential influencing factors for recurrence were analyzed.Results At the initial follow-up, the polyps recurrence rates were 4.15%, 18.79% and 21.62% , respectively, in group A, B and C, with statistically significant differences between group A and group B and C ( P 〈0.01), and no statistically significant difference between group B and C ( P 〉0.05). At the second follow-up, the polyps recurrence rates were 39.9%, 26.11% and 25.41%, respectively, in groups A, B and C, with statistically significant differences between group A and group B and C ( P 〈0.01), and no statistically significant difference between group B and C ( P 〉0.05).Conclusion We proposed that the timing of initial colonoscopy follow-up following resection of adenomatous colorectal polyps will be 1.0-1.5 years postoperatively. The second colonoscopy was followed for the third year of the first surgery.
作者 张莉 周建宁 任宏宇 刘俊 ZHANG Li;ZHOU Jianning;REN Hongyu;LIU Jun(Department of Gastroenterology,Union Hospital,Tongji Medical College,Huazhong University of Science and Technology,Wuhan 430022;Department of Gastroenterology,Liyuan Hospital,Tongji Medical College,Huazhong University of Science and Technology,China)
出处 《胃肠病学和肝病学杂志》 CAS 2018年第10期1148-1151,共4页 Chinese Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology
关键词 大肠息肉 息肉切除术后 随访 肠镜 Colon polyps Post polyptectomy Follow-up Colonoscopy
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献22

  • 1刘模荣,赵逵,宋剑,陈龙泉,王红.内镜高频电切大肠息肉术后复发素因及随访[J].遵义医学院学报,2004,27(2):148-149. 被引量:2
  • 2刘希双,林萍,刘思良,王光兰,戴素美,张民生,张翠萍.结肠良性肿瘤的病理特点与发病规律[J].中国内镜杂志,2005,11(10):1030-1034. 被引量:5
  • 3Massari LP, Kastelan M, Gruber F. Epidermal malignant tumors: pathogenesis, influence of UV light and apoptosis. Coll Ant#vpo12007; 31 Suppl 1: 83-85 [PMID: 17469758].
  • 4Martinez ME, Baron JA, Lieberman DA, Schatzkin A, Lanza E, Winawer SJ, Zauber AG, Jiang R, Ahnen DJ, Bond JH, Church TR, Robertson DJ, Smith- Warner SA, Jacobs ET, Alberts DS, Greenberg ER. A pooled analysis of advanced colorectal neoplasia diagnoses after colonoscopic polypectomy. Gastroenterology 2009; 136:832-841 [PMID: 19171141 DOI: 10.1053/i,~astro.2008.12.0071.
  • 5Kim JB, Han DS, Lee HL, Kim JP, Jeon YC, Sohn JH, Hahm JS. [The recurrence rate of colon polyp after polypectomy and the interval of surveillance colonoscopy: predictors of early development of advanced polyp]. Korean J Gastroenterol 2004; 44: 77-83 [PMID: 15329518].
  • 6Rosa I, Fidalgo P, Soares J, Vinga S, Oliveira C, Silva JP, Ferro SM, Chaves P, Oliveira AG, Leitao CN. Adenoma incidence decreases under the effect of polypectomy. World J Gastroenterol 2012; 18:1243-1248 [PMID: 22468088 DOI: 10.3748/wig. v18.i11.1243].
  • 7Gao QY, Chen HM, Sheng JQ, Zheng P, Yu CG, Jiang B, Fang JY. The first year follow-up after colorectal adenoma polypectomy is important: a multiple-center study in symptomatic hospital- based individuals in China. Front Med China 2010; 4:436-442 [PMID: 21128011 DOI: 10.1007/ s11684-010-0200-9].
  • 8Heresbach D, Barrioz T, Lapalus MG, Coumaros D, Bauret P, Potier P, Sautereau D, Bousti6re C, Grimaud JC, Barth616my C, S6e J, Serraj I, D'Halluin PN, Branger B, Ponchon T. Miss rate for colorectal neoplastic polyps: a prospective multicenter study of back-to-back video colonoscopies. Endoscopy 2008; 40:284-290 [PMID: 18389446 DOI: 10.1055/ s-2007-995618].
  • 9Kaltenbach T, Friedland S, Soetikno R. Arandomised tandem colonoscopy trial of narrow band imaging versus white light examination to compare neoplasia miss rates. Gut 2008; 57:1406-1412 [PMID: 18523025 DOI: 10.1136/ gut.2007.137984].
  • 10vail Rijn JC, Reitsma JB, Stoker J, Bossuyt PM, van Deventer SJ, Dekker E. Polyp miss rate determined by tandem colonoscopy: a systematic review. Am J Gastro~rnterol 2006; 101:343-350 [PMID: 16454841 DOI: 10.1111/j.1572-O241.2006.00390.x].

共引文献29

同被引文献36

引证文献4

二级引证文献34

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部