期刊文献+

胃食管反流病问卷在反流性食管炎诊断中的应用 被引量:6

The Application of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Questionnaire (Gerd Q) in the Diagnosis of Reflux Esophagitis
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的分析胃食管反流病问卷(GerdQ)在反流性食管炎诊断中的应用价值。方法共有720名患者参与此项研究,361例通过胃镜检查明确诊断为反流性食管炎(RE),359例为对照组,均完成胃食管反流病问卷(GerdQ)的填写,计量资料采用t检验,计数资料采用卡方检验,等级资料统计采用Spearman相关分析。ROC曲线用于确定RE诊断的最佳截断点,P<0.05被认为具有统计学差异。结果对照组绝大部分积分在0-6分之间,占87.74%,而RE组绝大部分积分在7分~14分之间,占72.58%,RE组GerdQ评分(8.12±2.99)分明显高于对照组(5.70±1.95)分,两组比较有显著性差异(P<0.05);361例RE患者内镜下食管粘膜损伤程度根据LA分级进行诊断,Spearman相关分析显示LA不同等级之间GerdQ积分无显著性差异(P>0.05);GerdQ 8分为诊断RE的最佳截断点,诊断灵敏性为91.35%,特异性为87.61%。结论胃食管反流病问卷对诊断反流性食管炎具有重要的价值,其诊断本病的最佳截断点为8分,但积分高低与本病内镜下食管粘膜损伤程度无明显相关性。 Objective To evaluate the value of gastroesophageal reflux disease questionnaire(Gerd Q)in the diagnosis of reflux esophagitis. Methods A total of 720 patients participated in this study,361 were diagnosed as reflux esophagitis(RE)by gastroscopy and 359 were healthy controls. All of them completed the Gerd Q. The t test was used to measure data. Chi-square test was used to count data. Spearman correlation analysis was used for ranking data statistics. The ROC curve was used to determine the optimal cut-off point for diagnosis of RE. p 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results Most of the scores in the control group ranged from 0 to 6 points,accounting for 87.74%,while most scores in the RE group ranged from 7 to 14 points,accounting for 72.58%.Gerd Q score of RE group(8.12±2.99)was significantly higher than that of control group(5.70±1.95),there was significant difference between two groups(p 0.05); The degree of endoscopic esophageal mucosal damage in 361 patients with RE was diagnosed according to LA classification. Spearman correlation analysis showed that there was no significant difference in Gerd Q scores between different grades of L A(P〉0.05); Gerd Q 8 points is the best cut-off point for diagnosis of RE with a diagnostic sensitivity of 91.35% and a specificity of 87.61%. Conclusions The gastroesophageal reflux disease questionnaire had important value in diagnosing reflux esophagitis. The best cut-off point for diagnosing the disease was 8 points,but there was no significant correlation between the level of the integral and the degree of esophageal mucosal damage under endoscopy.
作者 王荣欣 王晶 胡水清 Wang Rongxin;Wang Jing;Hu Shuiqing(Department of Emergency,Xuanwu Hospital of Capital Medical University,Beijing 100053,China)
出处 《中国病案》 2018年第7期103-105,共3页 Chinese Medical Record
关键词 胃食管反流病问卷 反流性食管炎 胃镜检查 Gastroesophageal reflux disease questionnaire Reflux esophagitis Gastroscopy
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献26

  • 1Flook NW, Wiklund I. Accounting for the effect of GERD symptoms on patients' health-related quality of life: supporting optimal disease management by primary care physicians. Int J Clin Pract 2007; 61: 2071-2078.
  • 2Dean BB, Crawley JA, Schmitt CM, Wong J, Ofman JJ. The burden of illness of gastro-oesophageaI re- flux disease: impact on work productivity. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2003; 17:1309-1317.
  • 3Vakil N. Review article: test and treat or treat and test in reflux disease? Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2003; 17 Suppl 2:57-59.
  • 4Pace F, Scarlata P, Casini V, Sarzi-Puttini P, Porto GB. Validation of the reflux disease questionnaire for an Italian population of patients with gastro-esophageal reflux disease. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepa- tol 2008; 20:187-190.
  • 5Dimenas E. Methodological aspects of evaluation of Quality of Life in upper gastrointestinal diseases. Scand J Gastroenterol Supp11993; 199:18-21.
  • 6Vakil N, Dent J, Jones R, Hailing K, Lind T, Jung- hard O. The accuracy and predictors of a clinical diagnosis of GERD by family practitioners and gas- troenterologists. Gastroenterology 2008; 134 (Supple I): A598.
  • 7Wang R, Yan X, Ma XQ, Cao Y, Wallander MA, Jo- hansson S, He J. Burden of gastroesophageal reflux disease in Shanghai, China. Dig Liver Dis 2009; 41: 110-115.
  • 8Revicki DA, Wood M, Wiklund I, Crawley J. Reli- ability and validity of the Gastrointestinal Symp- tom Rating Scale in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease. Qual Life Res 1998; 7:75-83.
  • 9Jones R, Coyne K, Wiklund I. The gastro-oesopha- geal reflux disease impact scale: a patient manage- ment tool for primary care. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2007; 25:1451-1459.
  • 10Shaw M, Dent J, Beebe T, Junghard O, Wiklund I, Lind T, Johnsson F. The Reflux Disease Ques- tionnaire: a measure for assessment of treatment response in clinical trials. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2008; 6:31.

共引文献66

同被引文献46

引证文献6

二级引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部