期刊文献+

后危机时代警惕新自由主义复辟的经济法理性 被引量:1

Economic Law Rational Interpretation of the Precaution to the Restoration of the Noe-Liberalism in Post-crisis Era
下载PDF
导出
摘要 自20世纪80年代以来,新自由主义的市场化、自由化和私有化的经济理论思想就一直是西方国家经济政策的核心,并经过"华盛顿共识"随着经济全球化在拉美及其他发展中国家推广。始于美国2007年次贷危机的2008年金融危机,宣告了新自由主义的终结,新自由主义的思想体系也备受质疑。危机改变了国际社会经济关系,开启了新的国际新秩序。欧美经济走向衰退,以中国为代表的新兴国家在危机中崛起。新自由主义危机的经验表明,市场与政府的关系密不可分,市场秩序、市场机制和市场缺陷都需要政府的参与。新自由主义危机为我国经济改革与发展以及经济法律新机制的构建提供了理论和实践依据。后危机时代,经济转型的改革应借鉴新自由主义危机的经验教训,避免新自由主义遗风的毒害,经济法应通过"第三条道路"在市场与政府间建立公私法兼容的第三法域新机制,以及构建市场与政府、社会共享的法律新机制。 Since the 1980s, the neo -liberalist theory of economic theory of marketization, liberalization, and privatization has been the core of Western countries' economic policy and has been popularized in Latin America and other developing countries through the "Washington Consensus" with economic globalization. The 2008 financial crisis that began in the United States in the subprime mortgage crisis in 2007 declared the end of the neo - liberalism and the ideology of the neo - liberalism was also ques- tioned. The crisis has changed the international social economic relations and opened up a new international new order. The Eu- ropean and American economies have entered a recession, and emerging countries represented by China have risen in the crisis. The experience of the neo - liberal crisis shows that the relationship between the market and the government is inextricably linked. Market order, market mechanism and market defects all require the participation of the government. The crisis of the neo -liberalism provides theoretical and practical basis for China's economic reform and development as well as the constrnetion of new economic and legal mechanisms. In the post - crisis era, the reform of economic transition in our country should draw les- sons from the experience and lessons of the neo - liberal crisis and avoid the poison of neo - liberal legacy. Economic law should pass a "third road" to establish a third legal domain compatible with public and private laws between the market and the govern- ment, as well as new legal mechanisms shared by the market, the government, and the society.
作者 董成惠 DONG Cheng-hui(School of Law and Political Science,Guangdong Ocean University,ZhanJiang 524009,Guangdong,China)
出处 《学术探索》 2018年第10期74-83,共10页 Academic Exploration
基金 广东省十三五规划2017年度后期资助项目(GH17HFX02)
关键词 新自由主义 市场 政府 经济法 noe- liberalism market government economic law
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献42

  • 1《马克思恩格斯选集》,2版,第4卷,北京:人民出版社,1995.
  • 2Eatwell, Roger; Wright, Anthony (1999). Contemporary political ideologies. London: Continuum Interaational Publishing Group.
  • 3Excerpts from Liberalism and Social Action, http ://teaehingamericanhistory. org/library/index, asp? document = 1450, 2010年3月9日获取.
  • 4Hombach, Bodo (2000). The politics of the new centre. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwelh.
  • 5Eatwell, Roger ; Wright, Anthony ( 1999 ). Contemporary political ideologies. London : Continuum International Publishing Group.
  • 6Richardson, James L. ( 2001 ). Contending Liberalisms in World Politics : Ideology and Power. Boulder, Colorado : Lynne Rienner Publishers.
  • 7Dewey, John(1930). Individualism, Old and New. New York: Minton. Balch & Co.
  • 8Hartwich, Olive ; Marc St Leonards( 2009 ). Neoliberalism : the genesis of a political swearword. New South Wales : The Centre for Independent Studies.
  • 9Harvey, David (2005). A Brief History of Neoliberalism. Oxford University Press.
  • 10Berlin,Isaiah(1984). Four Essays on Liberty, London: Oxford University Press.

共引文献20

同被引文献2

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部