期刊文献+

从“询”到“讯”:《治安管理处罚法》基本术语的辨析与取舍

Interrogation and Inquiry:The Selection and Discrimination of Terminology in the Revise of Security Administration Punishment Law
下载PDF
导出
摘要 《治安管理处罚法》出台之前,我国治安领域立法区分对违反治安管理行为人和证人、被害人的调查活动,分别采用"讯问"与"询问"的不同用语,《治安管理处罚法》中规定统一采用"询问",忽略了"讯""询"二者之间的区别,模糊了不同调查手段的界限,缺乏理论和事实依据。从词源、语言学、法理和国外经验等多角度对"讯问"与"询问"二者区别进行分析,能得出对违法人宜恢复使用"讯问"的结论。
作者 高晓巍
出处 《福建警察学院学报》 2018年第4期35-41,共7页 Journal of Fujian Police College
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献16

  • 1廖美珍.法庭语言实证报告[J].法律与生活,2003(12):2-5. 被引量:3
  • 2廖美珍.从问答行为看中国法庭审判现状[J].语言文字应用,2002(4):25-36. 被引量:26
  • 3Adelsward, Viveka, Karin Arosson, and Linda Joensson,1987. "The unequal distribution of interactional space: Dominance and control in courtroom interaction" [J]. Text (7).4:313 -346.
  • 4Aron, R., Fast, J. and Klein, R. ,1986.Trial Communication Skills[M]. New York: McGraw- Hill.
  • 5Atkinson, John M. and Paul Drew, 1979. Order in Court:The Organization of Verbal Interaction in Judicial Settings [M]. London: Macmillan.
  • 6Buelow- Moiler, A. M. , 1991. "Trial evidence: overt and covert communication in court" [J]. Applied Linguistics ( 1 ). 1 : 38 -60.
  • 7Drew, Paul. 1992. " Contested evidence in courtroom cross - examination: The ease of a trial for rape" [A]. In Paul Drew & John Heritage, eds. Talk at Work: Interaction in Institutional Settings[C].470 -520. Cambridge & New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • 8Glissan, James L. 1985. Cross- examination Practice and Procedure: An Australian Perspective[Z]. Sydney: Legal books.
  • 9Woodbuly, Hanni, 1985, "The interaction between judge and defendant" [A]. In T. Van Dijk ed. , Handbook of Discourse Analysis [C]. Vol. 4, 181 - 191. Amsterdam : North - Holland.
  • 10徐静村.刑事诉讼法[M]北京:法律出版社,1999.

共引文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部