期刊文献+

全球系统重要性银行的演变及其启示 被引量:5

The Evolution of Global Systemically Important Banks and Its Implications
原文传递
导出
摘要 基于巴塞尔委员会公布的明细数据,本文分析G-SIBs名单的变化特点及中资银行的分布特征。结果显示,G-SIBs系统重要性呈下降趋势;跨境行为切换成为系统重要性得分中贡献最大的因素;中资G-SIBs数量大幅增加,欧洲G-SIBs显著下降;复杂性和金融机构基础设施是近来决定G-SIBs级别变动的主要因素。相比于一般银行,G-SIBs要满足额外资本缓冲要求、恢复与处置计划、有效风险数据加总、大额风险暴露等更高的监管标准。 Based on the detailed data released by the Basel Committee, this paper presents an analysis of the change in G-SIBs list and the distribution characteristics of Chinese banks. The results of the paper show that the importance of G-SIBs system is declining; the cross-border behavior switching has become the most contributor to systemic importance scores;the quantity of Chinese-funded G-SIBs has increased significantly, and the quantity of European G-SIBs have declined significantly; the complexity and the base facilities of financial institutions are major factors in determining the change in the level of G-SIBs in recent times. Compared to general banks, the G-SIBs are required to meet the higher regulatory rules such as additional capital buffer requirements, recovery and disposal plans, summation of effective risk data, and large risk exposures, etc.
作者 熊启跃 易晓溦 XIONG Qi-yue;YI Xiao-wei
出处 《金融论坛》 CSSCI 北大核心 2018年第10期68-80,共13页 Finance Forum
基金 国家社科基金重点项目:新常态下中国系统性区域性金融风险新特征及防范对策研究(16AJY024) 教育部哲学社会科学研究重大研究课题攻关项目:经济新常态下中国金融开放与金融安全研究(17JZD015)
关键词 全球系统重要性银行 评分考核体系 额外资本缓冲 指标权重 监管配套措施 global systemically important bank scoring assessment system additional capital buffer indicator weight regulatory support measure
  • 相关文献

二级参考文献183

共引文献353

同被引文献37

引证文献5

二级引证文献18

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部