期刊文献+

参加美国病理家协会常规化学能力验证的不合格原因分析与探讨 被引量:5

The Causes of Unsatisfactory Performance in General Chemistry/Therapeutic Drugs Proficiency Testing with the College of American Pathologists' Programs at Hospital from 2012 to 2017
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的通过对我院医学检验科生化专业组2012~2017年连续6年参加美国病理家协会(College of American Pathologists,CAP)组织的常规化学能力验证计划的成绩进行统计分析,全面评价检测性能,发现存在的问题并对其进行改进,为质量控制提供依据,提高检测结果的准确性。方法评估首都医科大学附属北京世纪坛医院医学检验科生化专业组2012~2017年参加CAP常规化学的PT结果,对失控项目的原因进行统计分析。结果 2013年项次合格率最高,为100%;2014年项次合格率最低,为87. 5%;共有19个检测项目在2012~2017年成绩全部为100分,13个项目出现过成绩不合格;导致项目不合格的所有原因中,PT样本问题最突出,占68. 75%;其次是检测系统问题和分组不恰当,均为9. 38%,随机误差占比6. 25%;技术问题和书写错误占3. 13%。结论 CAP的能力验证活动可以用于对实验室的检测能力进行评估,对2012~2017年参加CAP的常规化学能力验证成绩进行总结,分析探讨不合格原因并采取相应纠正措施,可以进一步提高实验室结果的可靠性、准确性及可比性,以保证实验室对患者的服务质量。 Objective To evaluate the College of American Pathologists′(CAP)General Chemistry/Therapeutic Drugs Proficiency Testing performances for our laboratory with selected analyses and tests,so to identify existing problems for improvement of the laboratory quality management system in laboratory process. Methods We used the data from the Beijing Shijitan Hospital,a Capital Medical University affiliated hospital.The data of the Department of Clinical Laboratory Medicine General Chemistry/Therapeutic Drugs PT program from 2012 to 2017 was used to characterize the quality of testing in the Chemistry specialty.The reasons for all unacceptable results were sorted into 6 groups. Results From 2012 to 2017,a total of 19 of 32 analyses and tests (59.4%)achieved full scores (100%),whereas 13 analyses and tests failed to reach the standards of satisfactory.Percentage of acceptable results for all analyses in 2013 was the highest (100%)during six- year period.The reasons for unacceptable results were identification errors in PT specimen problem (68.75%),methodological problems (9.38%),wrong peer group used (9.38%),random error (6.25%),technical problems (3.13%),and clerical errors (3.13%). Conclusion These data imply that methods- based Proficiency Testing program of CAP analysis can facilitate the assessing of the PT performance of chemistry section of laboratory services.
作者 刘娜 胡梅 贾春地 邹良强 张曼 LIU Na;HU Mei;JIA Chun-di;ZOU Liang-qiang;ZHANG Man(Department of Clinical Laboratory,Beijing Shijitan Hospital,Capital Medical University,Department of Clinical Laboratory,Peking University Ninth School of Clinical Medicine,Beijing Key Laboratory of Urinary Cellular andMolecular Diagnostics,Beijing 100038,China)
出处 《标记免疫分析与临床》 CAS 2018年第10期1562-1567,共6页 Labeled Immunoassays and Clinical Medicine
基金 北京市医管局首届登峰人才计划(编号:Dfl20150701)
关键词 能力验证 质量改进 临床生化 美国病理家协会 室间质评 Proficiency testing laboratory quality improvement Clinical chemistry College of American Pathologists External quality assessment
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献14

  • 1刘小娟,黄亨建,李萍,徐克和,余霆,胥劲,叶艾竹,吴士吉.罗氏生化试剂用于奥林巴斯全自动生化分析仪的溯源性分析[J].华西医学,2004,19(3):401-402. 被引量:16
  • 2刘小娟,黄亨建,李萍.以CAP能力验证提高临床生化检验质量[J].检验医学,2005,20(5):470-473. 被引量:4
  • 3耿娟,黄亨建,李萍.不同生化检测系统CAP能力验证结果的差异性研究[J].现代检验医学杂志,2007,22(1):44-47. 被引量:2
  • 4Tietz NW, Rodgerson DO, Laessig RH. Are clinical laboratory proficiency testing as good as they can be[J]. Clin Chem, 1992,38:473-475.
  • 5Büttner J. The need for accuracy in laboratory medicine[J]. Eur J Clin Chem Clin Biochem,1995,33:981-988.
  • 6Kailner A. quality management in the medical laboratory: a comparison of draft standards[J]. Clin Chim Acta,1998,278:111-119.
  • 7Miller WG,Ross JW. Pushing proficiency testing results to their limits[J]. CAP-Today,1999,13:93-95.
  • 8Robert R, Norton-Wenzel CS, Cao ZM. Target values and method evaluation in the proficiency testing program[J].Clin Chem,2001,47:2185-2186.
  • 9Richard W. Jenny-Kathryn Y,Jackson T. Causes of unsat- isfactory performance in proficiency testing [J]. Clinical Chemistry, 2000,46 (1) 89-99.
  • 10Liu XJ,Dai QK, Jiang YM. Proficiency testing experience with college of American pathologistsprograms at a uni- versity hospital in China from 2007 to 2011 [J]. Arch Pathol Lab Med,2014,138(1) :114-120.

共引文献3

同被引文献33

引证文献5

二级引证文献11

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部