期刊文献+

甲磺酸阿帕替尼与替吉奥治疗晚期胃癌的疗效和安全性比较 被引量:12

Comparison of efficacy and safety of apatinib mesylate versus tegafur for advanced gastric cancer
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨甲磺酸阿帕替尼与替吉奥在晚期胃癌患者中的治疗效果与安全性的比较。方法选取2016年1月至2017年6月间安徽省砀山县人民医院收治的64例晚期胃癌患者进行回顾性分析,采用口服甲磺酸阿帕替尼治疗的32例患者纳入观察组,采用口服替吉奥治疗的32例患者纳入对照组。比较两组患者治疗4周后的疾病控制率及不良反应发生率。结果两组患者近期疗效比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。服用甲磺酸阿帕替尼和替吉奥的不良反应主要有腹泻、白细胞减少、手足综合征及高血压,观察组患者不良反应发生率为34.4%,低于对照组患者的56.3%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论甲磺酸阿帕替尼用于治疗晚期胃癌疗效确切,能够降低不良反应的发生率。 Objective To investigate the efficacy and safety of apatinib mesylate versus tegafur in patients with advanced gastric cancer. Methods A total of 64 patients with advanced gastric cancer treated at Dangshan County People's Hospital from January 2016 to June 2017 were retrospectively analyzed. Thirtytwo patients who were given oral apatinib mesylate were involved in the observation group and 32 patients who were given oral tegafur were involved in the control group. After four weeks of treatment,the disease control rate and the incidence of adverse reactions were observed and recorded between the two groups.Results There was no significant difference in short-term efficacy between the two groups( P〉0. 05). The adverse reactions for apatinib mesylate and teglio mainly were diarrhea,leukopenia,hand-foot syndrome,and hypertension. The incidence of adverse reactions was 34. 4% for the observation group,which was significantly lower than 56. 3% of the control group( P〈0. 05). Conclusion Apatinib mesylate is effective in the treatment of advanced gastric cancer,which can significantly reduce the incidence of adverse reactions in patients with advanced gastric cancer.
作者 李学超 闵庆怀 常安 LI Xue-chao;MIN Qing-huai;CHANG An(Department of Oncology,Dangshan County People's Hospital,Suzhou 235300,China)
出处 《中国肿瘤临床与康复》 2018年第10期1241-1243,共3页 Chinese Journal of Clinical Oncology and Rehabilitation
关键词 甲磺酸阿帕替尼 替吉奥 晚期胃肿瘤 Apatinib mesylate Tegafur Advanced gastric neoplasms
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献46

  • 1刘秀峰,秦叔逵.洛铂的临床研究进展[J].临床肿瘤学杂志,2006,11(7):549-552. 被引量:53
  • 2Parkin DM,Bray F,Ferlay J,et al.Global cancer statistics,2002[J].CA Cancer J Clin,2005,55(2):74.
  • 3Miller A B,Hoogstraten B,Staquet M,et al.Reporting results of cancer treatment[J].Cancer,1981,47(1):207.
  • 4Alberts SR,Cervantes A,VANDE Velde CJ,et al.Gastric cancer:epidemiology,pathology and treatment[J].Ann Oncol,2003,14(suppl 2):S31.
  • 5Sato A,Ito T,Tomita T.Chemotherapy of gastric cancer-a review of clinical trials in Japan 2002[J].Gan To Kaggku Ryobo,2002,29(9):1522.
  • 6Koizumi W.S-1 plus cisplatin versus S-1 alone for first-line treatment of advanced gastric cancer.(SPIRITS trial):a phase Ⅲ trial[J].Lancet Oncol,2008,9(3):215.
  • 7Boku N.Chemotherapy for metastatic disease:review from JCOG trials[J].International Journal of Clinical Oncology,2008,13(3):196.
  • 8Wesolowski R, Lee C, Kim R. Is there a role for second - line chemotherapy in adavanced gastric cancer [ J ] ? Lancet Oncol, 2009,10:903 - 912.
  • 9Maehara Y. S - 1 in gastric cancer: a comprehensive review [ J]. Gastric Cancer,2003,6 ( Suppl 1 ) :2 - 8.
  • 10M Jin, H Lu, J Li, et al. Ramdomized 3 - armed phase Ⅲ study of S - 1 monotherapy versus S - 1/CDDP(SP) versus 5 - FU/CDDP (FP) in paitents(pts) with advanced gastric cancer( AGC ) : SC - 101 study[J]. J Clin Oneol,26(suppl):4533.

共引文献323

同被引文献80

引证文献12

二级引证文献26

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部