摘要
《人类辅助生殖技术管理办法》规定了禁止代孕的原则,但却没法实际有效的规制层出不穷的由代孕引发的"纠纷",一刀切式的否认代孕协议的法律效力不能解决问题,在美国法院审理代孕协议是否有效时会举行听证会对合同的效力进行认定,对于其他国家的立法模式的比较,旨在对我国予以借鉴,本文从代孕协议的性质入手,并结合现今的跨国代孕现象,对代孕协议准据法的确定予以分析并提出建议。
The Management Measures for Human Assisted Reproductive Technology stipulates the principle ofprohibiting surrogacy, but it is hard to effectively restrain various disputes caused by surrogacy. However, thecomplete denial of the legal effect of the surrogacy agreement cannot solve the problem. For example, in America,when the court judging whether the surrogacy agreement is valid or not, a hearing will be held to determine thevalidity of the contract. Such of the comparison of legislative modes of other countries is aim to provide referenceto China. From the nature of the surrogacy agreement, combined the current transnational surrogacy phenomenon,this article analyzes how to determine the proper law of surrogacy agreement, and makes some suggestions about it.
作者
刘奕麟
Liu Yilin(Nankai University,Tianjing 30035)
出处
《安徽警官职业学院学报》
2018年第4期25-29,共5页
Journal of Anhui Vocational College of Police Officers
关键词
代孕协议
法律规制
准据法
surrogacy agreement
legal regulation
proper law