期刊文献+

行政审批效率与中国制造业出口——基于行政审批中心建立的“准自然实验” 被引量:36

The Efficiency of Administrative Approval and Export Performance: Based on the Quasi-Natural Experiment of Administrative Approval Center
原文传递
导出
摘要 文章基于1998-2006年工业企业数据库,以各地行政审批中心的成立为"准自然实验",在样本满足趋势一致性和随机性的假设条件下,采用双重差分法系统考察了行政审批效率对出口贸易的影响。研究发现:(1)行政审批中心显著提升了城市出口绩效,但政策效果存在一定时滞;(2)政策效果在不同行业间存在显著差异,其中非国有资本密集型行业和契约密集型行业从行政审批中心的建立中获益更大;(3)从微观企业层面来看,行政审批中心对出口贸易的促进作用主要来源于出口倾向的提高,即扩展边际,并且在内资企业、小规模企业以及在位企业方面表现得尤为明显。进一步的作用机制研究发现,行政审批中心的建立有效降低了企业的制度性交易成本,同时提升了企业的进入市场倾向和生产率,因而有利于出口贸易的增长。 In recent years,with the slow recovery of the global economy,the shrinking of external demands and the rising cost of labor,it is difficult for the comparative advantages of cheap labor to continue to exert the driving force of exports on economic growth. Under this background,it is an important breakthrough for China to build a new type of comparative advantage in exports through institutional reforms,innovations,and excavation of comparative advantages. Among them,the administrative examination and approval center,as a derivative system innovation in the reform of the administrative examination and approval system,is of great significance in reducing the institutional transaction costs and enterprises' burdens,and helping enterprises develop international markets. The study of this issue will not only help clarify the intrinsic mechanism of this institutional innovation on export trade and dig deeply into the institution comparative advantages,but also has profound policy guidance implications to further deepen the reform of the administrative examination and approval system,and enhance the efficiency of administrative approval and release the vitality of the institution. Based on the perspective of tapping new institutional comparative advantages,this paper firstly examines the effect of administrative approval efficiency on export performance. Specifically,using statistic data of China annual survey of industrial firms over the 1998 to 2006 period,this paper empirically studies the impacts of administrative approval efficiency on exports from the evidence of establishing Administrative Approval Center's Quasi-Natural Experiment under the assumption that the sample meets the trend consistency and randomness. The difference-in-differences estimations show that,first,Administrative Approval Center can promote cities' export performance significantly,yet with a certain amount of time lag. Second,there are huge differences between industries on the effect of policies. Industries with high non-state-owned capital intensity and high contract intensity benefit more from policies. Third,from micro-aspects of enterprises,such positive effect on export values is mainly from the raising of extensive margin,especially in domestic-funded,small and incumbent firms. Finally,we analyze the mechanism of how Administrative Approval Center influences export behaviors,and find that it reduces institutional transaction costs and improves firms' tendency of entering markets and productivity. Based on the above findings,this article believes that we must continue to deepen the reform of the administrative examination and approval system,improve the function of the administrative examination and approval center,and further release the institutional dynamism to stimulate the growth of export trade. To this end,the various examination and approval departments must not only clarify their own responsibilities,but also strengthen communication and collaboration among departments,especially play the role of the E-government system.
作者 冯笑 王永进 刘灿雷 Feng Xiao;Wang Yongjin;Liu Canlei(School of Economics,Nankai University,Tianjin 300071,China;Institute of International Economics,University of International Business and Economics,Beijing 100029,China)
出处 《财经研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2018年第10期98-110,共13页 Journal of Finance and Economics
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(71573141 71673150 71473133) 教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大项目(16JJD790010) 对外经济贸易大学2017年中央高校基本科研业务经费项目(17QD16)
关键词 行政审批效率 制度 出口贸易 efficiency of Administrative Approval institution export
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

二级参考文献374

共引文献1589

同被引文献596

引证文献36

二级引证文献315

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部