期刊文献+

成人脑胶质母细胞瘤术前非影像学预后危险因素综合评估 被引量:1

Comprehensive assessment of preoperative non-imaging prognostic risk factors for adult glioblastoma
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的综合脑胶质母细胞瘤(GBM)术前非影像学危险因素评估预后。方法回顾性分析159例脑GBM病人术前非影像学因素对总生存期(OS)的影响,对性别、发病年龄、术前KPS评分、血小板与淋巴细胞比(PLR)、肿瘤部位、肿瘤最大直径等因素行Kaplan-Meier生存分析和Cox回归分析,并利用回归系数计算预后指数(PI),利用Cutoff Finder网页工具求PI界值划分高危、低危组,并对两组病人的OS进行统计学分析。结果术前KPS评分(RR=1.78)、PLR(RR=1.68)、年龄(RR=1.45)是影响GBM病人预后的独立危险因素(P<0.05)。PI界值为2.25,PI>2.25为高危组,PI≤2.25为低危组,两组OS差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)。结论 PI计算简单易于推广,对GBM病人具有较高的预后预测价值。 Objective To comprehensively evaluate the prognosis by preoperative non-imaging risk factors in patients with glioblastoma(GBM). Methods The effect of preoperative non-imaging factors on overall survival(OS) in 159 GBM patients were analyzed retrospectively. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Cox regression analysis were used for the factors as sex, age of onset,preoperative KPS score, platelet to lymphocyte ratio(PLR), tumor site, the maximum diameter of tumor and so on. Then, the regression cofficient was used to calculate the prognosis index(PI) and the Cutoff Finder web tool to calculate the PI boundary value, and the patients were divided into the high risk group and low risk group based on PI boundary value. Finally, patients' OS of the two groups was statistically analyzed. Results The preoperative KPS score(RR = 1.78), PLR(RR = 1.68) and age(RR = 1.45) were independent risk factors influencing prognosis of GBM patients(P 0.05). The PI boundary value was 2.25, then more than 2.25 served as high-risk group and less than or equal to 2.25 as low-risk group, and the difference of OS between the two groups was statistically significant(P 0.01). Conclusion PI is simple to calculate and easy to be popularized, and has higher predictive value for GBM patients' prognosis.
作者 宋洪旺 王鹏斐 孔令伟 邢攸学 闫长祥 李守巍 Song Hongwang;Wang Pengfei;Kong Lingwei;Xing Youxue;Yan Changxiang;Li Shouwei(Department ofNeurosurgery,Sanbo Brain Hospital,Capital Medical University,Beijing 100093,China)
出处 《中国微侵袭神经外科杂志》 CAS 2018年第9期385-388,共4页 Chinese Journal of Minimally Invasive Neurosurgery
基金 12-5科技支撑项目(编号:2014BAI04B01) 北京市自然科学基金项目(编号:7182076) 首都卫生发展科研专项(编号:首发2018-2-8011)
关键词 胶质母细胞瘤 危险因素 非影像学 术前 预后指数 glioblastoma risk factors non-imaging preopreative prognosis index
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献46

  • 1高金霞,宿英英.等热量不同糖成分营养制剂对急性脑卒中患者血糖影响的随机对照研究[J].中国临床营养杂志,2008,16(4):209-215. 被引量:12
  • 2周翠萍,宿英英.重症脑卒中患者对等热卡不同蛋白质入量的肠内营养代谢反应:51例随机对照研究[J].中国临床营养杂志,2006,14(6):351-355. 被引量:38
  • 3中华医学会.临床诊疗指南-肠外肠内营养学分册(2008版).北京:人民卫生出版社,2009:1-10.
  • 4Kondrup J, Rasmussen HH, Hamberg O, et al. Nutritional risk screening ( NRS 2002) : a new method based on an analysis of controlled clinical trials. Clin Nutr, 2003, 22:321-336.
  • 5Kondrup J, Allison SP, Elia M, et ah ESPEN guidelines for nutrition screening 2002. Clin Nutr, 2003, 22:415-421.
  • 6Mueller C, Compher C, Ellen DM. A. S. P. E. N. clinical guidelines: nutrition screening, assessment, and intervention inadults. J Parenter Enteral Nutr, 2011 , 35 : 16-24.
  • 7Krishnan JA, Parce PB, Martinez A, et al. Caloric intake in medical ICU patients: consistency of care with guidelines and relationship to clinical outcomes. Chest, 2003, 124:297-305.
  • 8ASPEN Board of Directors and the Clinical Guidelines Task Force. Guidelines for the use of parenteral and enteral nutrition in aduh and pediatric patients. J Parenter Enteral Nutr, 2002, 26 (1 Suppl) : 1-138.
  • 9Esper DH, Coplin WM, Carhuapoma JR. Energy expenditure in patients with nontraumatic intracranial hemon'hage. J Parenter Enteral Nutr, 2006, 30:71-75.
  • 10Bardutzky J, Georgiadis D, Kollmar R, et al. Energy demand in patients with stroke who are sedated and receiving mechanical ventilation. J Neurosurg, 2004, 100:266-271.

共引文献167

同被引文献1

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部