期刊文献+

微型营养评定精法在老年恶性肿瘤住院患者应用的多中心研究 被引量:12

The application value of mini-nutritional assessment short-form in screening and evaluating nutritional status in the elderly hospitalized patients with malignant tumor: a multicenter study
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨微型营养评定精法(MNA—SF)在筛查和评价老年恶性肿瘤住院患者营养状态的应用价值。方法2012年4—5月对≥65岁的老年恶性肿瘤住院患者,应用MNA—SF的方法,进行前瞻性调查研究,了解其营养状态;总结临床结局指标,并分析MNA—SF与体重指数(BMI)、握力和营养风险筛查2002(NRS2002)结果的一致性;分析不同营养状态与临床结局的相关性。结果本研究纳入符合人选标准及不符合排除标准的各种老年恶性肿瘤患者1472例,平均(72.1±5.9)岁,BMI(22.3±3.7)kg/m2,握力(21.7±19.0)kg;老年恶性肿瘤患者营养不良发生率为16.7%,胰腺癌30.9%、胆管癌24.1%、食管癌21.2%居前三位,乳腺癌5.4%发生率最低;营养不良和营养不良危险合并为存在营养问题者,本组发生率为59.2%(营养不良16.7%+营养不良危险42.5%),其中胆管癌82.8%最高,乳腺癌28.6%最低;MNA—SF识别的营养不良(评分在0~7分)与BMI诊断的营养不良(〈18.5)的一致性高度符合;而与握力诊断的营养不良一致性较差;MNA—SF识别的存在营养问题(营养不良+营养不良危险)与NRS2002发现的营养风险(评分≥3分)结果一致性高度符合;存在营养问题(营养不良及营养不良危险)的老年恶性肿瘤患者感染并发症为9.29%,高于营养正常者的5.14%(P=0.006);总住院时间为(15.4±10.7)d,长于营养正常者的(12.8±10.4)d(P=0.00)。结论老年恶性肿瘤的住院患者营养不良和营养不良危险发生率较高,并且可能恶化临床结局,MNA—SF可用于老年肿瘤患者的营养筛查。 Objective To investigate the application value of mini-nutritional assessment short form(MNA-SF) in screening and evaluating nutritional status in elderly hospitalized patients with malignant tumor. Methods 1472 elderly hospitalized patients(≥65 years old)with malignant tumor were enrolled and prospectively studied for evaluating the nutritional status by nutritional risk screening 2002 (NRS 2002) assessment. Indicators of clinical outcomes were summarized. The consistencies of MNA-SF with body mass index(BMI),grip and results of NRS 2002 assessment,and the relationship between the different nutritional status and clinical outcomes were analyzed. Results The patients meeting the inclusion/exclusion criteria were aged ( 72.1 ± 5.9) years, with BMI of(22.3 ±3.7)kg/m2 and grip of(21.7±19.0)kg. Among 16.7% of the malnourished patients with malignant tumors, pancreatic cancer ( 30.9 %), bile duct cancer ( 24.1 % ) and esophageal cancer ( 21.2 % ) occupied the top three incidence of malnutrition, with the lowest (5.4%)incidence in breast cancer. Among 59.2% of patients being malnourished (16.7%)or at risk (42.5%)of malnutrition, the highest incidence was in bile duct cancer(82. 8%), and lowest one was in breast cancer(28.6%). MNA-SF- discriminated malnutrition(0-7 points)showed a great agreement with malnutrition evaluation by BMI(〈18.5) ,but had a poor agreement with grip in screening malnutrition. MNA-SF-discriminated nutrition problem(malnourishment plus at risk of malnutrition)showed a great agreement with NRS 2002-discovered nutrition problem (score ≥ 3 ). Under-nourished patients had a higher infection complication(9.29% vs. 5.14% ,P=0. 006)and longer hospital stays(15.4 d vs. 12.8 d,P〈0.01)as compared with patients with normal nutrition status. Conclusions The prevalence and risk factors for malnutrition are higher in elderly patients with malignant tumor. Poor nutritional status is correlated with poor clinical outcomes. MNA-SF can be used as a tool for evaluating the nutritional status of elderly patients with malignant tumor.
作者 吕骅 杨鑫 陈伟 吴咏冬 崔红元 许静涌 朱明炜 石汉平 韦军民 Lyu Hua ,Yang Xin , Chen Wei, Wu Yongdong, Cui Hongyuan, Xu Jingyong, Zhu Mingwei, Shi Hanping, Wei Junmin(Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Beijing Hospital, National Geriatrics Center, Beijing 100730 ,China ; Department of Clinical Nutrition, Peking Union Medical College and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing 100021 , China ; Department of Digestive Disease, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100050, China ; Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Beijing Shijitan Hospital ,Capital Medical University ,Beijing 100038 ,China)
出处 《中华老年医学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2018年第10期1102-1106,共5页 Chinese Journal of Geriatrics
关键词 肿瘤 微型营养评定精法 营养评价 临床结局 Neoplasms MNA-SF Nutrition assessment Clinical outcomes
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献93

  • 1陈伟,蒋朱明,张永梅,王秀荣,陈春明,史轶蘩.欧洲营养不良风险调查方法在中国住院患者的临床可行性研究[J].中国临床营养杂志,2005,13(3):137-141. 被引量:215
  • 2August DA, Huhmann MB. A. S. P. E. N. clinical guidelines: nutrition support therapy during adult anticancer treatment and in hematopoietic cell transplantation [ J ]. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr, 2009, 33(5):472-500.
  • 3Bozzetti F, Arends J, Lundholm K, et al. ESPEN Guidelines on Parenteral Nutrition: non-surgical oncology[ J]. Clin Nutr, 2009, 28(4) :445 -454.
  • 4Braga M, Ljungqvist O, Soeters P, et al. ESPEN Guidelines on Parenteral Nutrition : surgery[ J]. Clin Nutr, 2009, 28 (4) :378 - 386.
  • 5Weimann A, Braga M, Harsanyi L, et al. ESPEN guidelines on enteral nutrition : Surgery including organ transplantation[J]. Clin Nutr, 2006, 25(2) :224 -244.
  • 6Arends J, Bodoky G, Bozzetti F, et al. ESPEN guidelines on enteral nutrition : Non-surgical oncology [J]. Clin Nutr, 2006, 25 (2) :245 -259.
  • 7Fearon K, Strasser F, Anker SD, et al. Definition and classification of cancer cachexia: an international consensus [J]. Lancet Oncol, 2011, 12(5) :489 -495.
  • 8Detsky AS, McLaughlin JR, Baker JP, et al. What is subjective global assessment of nutritional status [J]. J Parenter Enteral Nutr, 1987, 11(2): 8-13.
  • 9Guigoz Y. The mini nutritional assessment ( MNA ) review of the literature-What does it tell us [ J]. J Nutr Health Aging, 2006, 10(6) :466 -485.
  • 10Stratton RJ, King CL, Stroud MA, et al. Malnutrition universal screening tool predicts mortality and length of hospital stay in acutely ill elderly [J]. Br J Nutr, 2006, 95 ( 15 ) :325 - 330.

共引文献355

同被引文献120

引证文献12

二级引证文献74

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部