期刊文献+

微创拔牙法拔除下颌近中阻生牙生理微创的观察 被引量:6

Survey on the physiological minimally invasive effect of minimally invasive surgery in the removal of impacted mesial mandibular molars
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的研究微创拔牙法拔除下颌近中阻生牙生的生理微创效果。方法选择2016年3月~2018年1月来我院拔除下颌近中阻生牙的324例患者作为研究对象,按照随机数字表法分为研究组与对照组,每组各162例,研究组采取微创拔牙法,对照组采取常规拔牙,比较两组临床效果。结果经过观察两组患者治疗效果看出,研究组优良率94.44%较对照组81.48%提高(P <0.05);研究组并发症发生率15.43%比对照组56.17%低,结果具有统计学意义(P <0.05)。结论微创拔牙法在下颌近中阻生牙拔除中具有重要意义,进一步增强生理微创效果,减少并发症发病率,安全性较高,为预后提供保障。 Objective To observe the physiological minimally invasive effect of minimally invasive surgery in the removal of impacted mesial mandibular molars. Methods Three hundred and twenty-four patients underwent the removal of impacted mesial mandibular molars who treated from March 2016 to January 2018 in our hospital were selected as research object. The subjects were randomly divided into study group and control group, 162 cases in each group. The study group received the minimally invasive surgery, the control group received the conventional tooth extraction. The clinical effect of the two groups were compared. Results The good rate in the study group(94.44%) was significanlly higher than that in control group(81.48%), the difference was statistically significant(P 〈 0.05); The incidence rate of complications in the study group(15.43%) was significanlly lower than that of control group(56.17%), the difference was statistically signifieant(P 〈 0.05). Conclusion The minimally invasive surgery in the removal of impacted mesial mandibular molars is of great importance, which can increase the physiological minimally invasive effect, reduce the incidence rate of complications and improve the clinical safety and prognosis.
作者 林展葱 LIN Zhancong(Changping Hospital of Dongguan City, Dongguan 523573, China)
出处 《中国医药科学》 2018年第18期241-243,共3页 China Medicine And Pharmacy
关键词 生理微创 下颌近中阻生牙 微创拔牙 牙阻力 Physiological minimally invasive effect Impacted mesial mandibular molars Minimally invasive extraction of teeth Tooth resistance
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

二级参考文献63

  • 1张永信.严格掌握抗菌药物应用指征[J].中国临床医生杂志,2005,33(5):16-17. 被引量:16
  • 2孟凡文,胡开进,胡坤,陈云俊,吴占敖.无痛微创拔牙技术在齿槽外科的应用[J].口腔医学研究,2007,23(4):431-433. 被引量:44
  • 3何影,孙晋虎.牙钻微创去骨分牙法拔除下颌埋伏阻生智齿的临床研究[J].微创医学,2007,2(5):425-426. 被引量:13
  • 4LaureanoFilho JR, de Oliveirae Silva ED, Batista CI, et al. Thein- fluence of cryotherapy on reduction of swelling, pain and tfis- musafter third-molar extraction : A preliminary study [ J 1. J Am DentAssoc ,2005,136 (6) :774 - 778.
  • 5Pavlikov6 G, Fohan R, Horka M, et al. Piezosurgery in oral and maxillofacial surgery [ J ]. International Journal of Oral and Maxil- lofacialSurgery,2011,40 (5) :451 - 457.
  • 6Sortino F, Pedulla E, Masoli V. The piezoelectric and rotatory oste- otomy technique in impacted third molar surgery: Comparisonof postoperative recovery [ J ]. J Oral Maxil]ofacSurg, 2008,66 ( 12 ) : 2444 - 2448.
  • 7Barone A, Santini S, Marconcini S, et al. Osteotomy and membra- neelevation during the maxillary sinus augmentation procedure. Acomparative study:piezoelectric device vs. conventional rotativein- struments[ J]. Clin Oral Implants Res,2008,19(5) :511 -515.
  • 8Seshan H, Konuganti K, Zope S. Piezosurgery in periodontology and oral implantology[ J]. J Indian SocPeriodonto1,2009,13 ( 3 ) : 155 - 156.
  • 9何建芳. 下颌智牙阻生引发下颌第二磨牙远中根完全吸收的综合治疗分析[C]//中华口腔医学会全科口腔医学专业委员会全国第三次全科口腔医学学术会议论文集. 2012: 53-53.
  • 10Correa AP, Faverani LP, Ramalho-Ferreira G, et al. Unerupted lower third molar extractions and their risks for mandibular fracture [J]. J Craniofac Surg, 2014, 25(3): e228-229.

共引文献173

同被引文献44

引证文献6

二级引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部