期刊文献+

基于课堂表现和纸笔测验综合评价学生 被引量:2

Comprehensive Evaluation of Students Based on Classroom Performance and Paper and Pencil Test
下载PDF
导出
摘要 针对于学生评价方式主要的问题,一是评价方式单一,纸笔测验仍然处于绝对垄断地位,忽略了学生的一些其他的不可测的因素,例如学生的远大志向,综合能力,学习态度,团结协作等。二是评价目标片面,没有做到三维目标并重;三是有悖于最新提出的教育核心素质的观念。四是课堂表现评价虽被运用,但是并非纳入到评价学生全面素质的重要参考因素之列。如何更全面地评价学生成为当今教育的首要问题,利用课堂表现来弥补无法全面评价学生的不足,将课堂表现与纸笔测验有机结合可综合评价学生。 In view of the main problems of student evaluation methods, one is that the evaluation method is single, the paperand-pencil test is still in an absolute monopoly position, and some other unpredictable factors of the students are neglected, such as the students' lofty aspirations, comprehensive ability, learning attitude, and unity collaboration, etc. Second, the evaluation target is one-sided, and the three-dimensional goal is not equal; the third is the concept of the core quality of education proposed. Fourth, although classroom performance evaluation is applied, it is not included in the important reference factors for evaluating students' overall quality. How to more comprehensively evaluate students to become the primary problem of today's education, use classroom performance to make up for the insufficiency of students who can't fully evaluate students, and combine classroom performance with paper-and-pencil test to comprehensively evaluate students.
作者 雒婷雯 陈亚芍 LUO Tingwen;CHEN Yashao(School of Chemistry & Chemical Engineering,Shaanxi Normal University,Xi'an,Shaanxi 710062)
出处 《科教导刊》 2018年第30期177-178,共2页 The Guide Of Science & Education
关键词 课堂表现 纸笔测验 三维目标 综合评价 classroom performance paper and pencil test three-dimensional goal comprehensive evaluation
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献52

  • 1马来平.科学方法的分类:评价及一种可能的方案[J].自然辩证法研究,1991,7(8):1-6. 被引量:4
  • 2朱立群.建立与新课程相适应的课堂教学评价体系[J].辽宁教育研究,2004(5):32-33. 被引量:6
  • 3梁惠燕,高凌飚.课堂教学评价的反思和框架重构[J].教育科学研究,2006(6):20-23. 被引量:35
  • 4[日]佐藤学.学习的快乐:走向对话[M].钟启泉译.北京:教育科学出版社,2004.38.
  • 5[日]佐藤正夫.教学原理[M].钟启泉译.北京:教育科学出版社,2001.101
  • 6日本教育方法学会.现代教育方法事典[M].东京:图书文化,2004.65.
  • 7Scriven, M. The Methodology of Evaluation [A]. Tyler, H.,et al. (eds). Perspectives of Curriculum Evaluation [Cj.AERAMonograph Series on Curriculum Evaluation. No. 1. Chicago : RandMcNally, 1967.39-44.
  • 8约翰.罗尔斯.正义论[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社,2003.86.
  • 9Camilli,G. & Shepard, L.A. Methods for IdentifyingBiased Test Items [ M ] .Thousand Oaks : Sage Publications, 1994.
  • 10Guba,E. G. & Lincoln, Y. S. Fourth Generation Evaluation[M]. Newhurg Park.CA: Sage, 1989.

共引文献1549

同被引文献6

引证文献2

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部