论北方早期青瓷、白瓷间的关系——兼论北方“青白瓷”

On the Relationship between Early Celadon and White Porcelain in the North——Also on the Qingbai Porcelain in the North

长期以来，古陶瓷学界坚持认为，中国早期瓷器主要分青瓷、白瓷两大体系，青瓷是一元配方，北方早期白瓷则是三元配方。本文基于磁州窑唐代青瓷、“青白瓷”、白瓷和宋代青瓷、白瓷五种样品成分对比分析，发现磁州窑的青瓷和白瓷在胎料组成和烧成温度上并无明显差别，主要是釉料不同，且出现了化妆土，这一结果从一个侧面证明，中国北方早期白瓷的瓷胎仍为一元配方，青瓷与白瓷之间有着密切的联系。而以“磁州窑”为代表的北方“青白瓷”明显不同于南方的“青白瓷”，其游离于青瓷与白瓷之间，终未自成一体。

For a long time, the ancient ceramic circle has insisted that there are mainly two branches of China＇ s early porcelain products, namely celadon and white porcelain. The formula for celadon is unitary and ternary for early white porcelain in the North. By comparing composition analyses of five samples from Cizhou Yao, i.e. celadon, Qingbai porcelain, white porcelain made in Tang Dynasty, and celadon, white porcelain made in Song Dynasty, this article presents its findings that there is no obvious difference between the pastes and baking temperature of celadon and white porcelain made in Cizhou Yao, the major difference lay in their glazes, and there was the existence of make-up clay. This finding proves that the formula for early white porcelain in North China was still unitary and there was a close connection between celadon and white porcelain. Qingbai Porcelain in the North, represented by those made in Cizhou Yao and obviously different from their counterparts made in the South, floated up and away from celadon and white porcelain and had never developed a style of its own.