摘要
随着当代资本主义危机主要以金融危机形式呈现,明斯基的分析框架成为学术时尚。一种代表性的观点认为,当前危机源自金融领域而非现实经济,危机更像明斯基式危机而非马克思式危机,最完善的资本主义金融分析来自明斯基而非马克思。然而,明斯基的理论体系缺陷明显,对危机认识过于片面,对停滞—金融化缺乏有效解释,因而整合马克思和明斯基的理论体系,构建全面的资本主义危机理论也成为一种学术倾向。由于二者在方法论、理论体系、阶级立场的根本差异,这种折中主义的长期努力并未取得实质性结果。厘清二者关系,有助于把握当代资本主义矛盾及危机,更好地坚持和发展马克思主义。
As contemporary capitalist crisis is mainly presented in the form of financial crisis,Minsky's analytical framework has become popular in academia. A representative view argues that the current crisis is rooted in the financial sector rather than real economy and it is more of a Minsky crisis than a Marxian crisis. There-fore,the best financial analysis of capitalism comes from Minsky,not Marx. Minsky's theory,however,has obvious defects due to its one-sided understanding of crisis and invalid interpretation of stagnation-financialization. Therefore,integrating Marx and Minsky to construct a comprehensive capitalist crisis theory has also become an academic inclination. This long-term effort of eclectic integration has not yielded substantial results due to the fundamental differences in methodology,theoretical system,and class positions in Marx and Minsky. Clarifying the relationship between Marx and Minsky will help us to recognize the contradictions and crises of contemporary capitalism and on that basis better develop and adhere to Marxism.
出处
《马克思主义研究》
CSSCI
北大核心
2018年第9期46-53,共8页
Studies on Marxism