内隐积极消极情感量表测评大学生样本的效度和信度

Validity and reliability of the Implicit Positive and Negative Affect Test in college students

目的:探讨内隐积极消极情感量表(IPANAT)在大学生群体中的适用情况。方法:选取安徽省3所本科高校大一、大二和大三的学生共867人,施测IPANAT中文版,并以积极消极情感量表(PANAS)作为效标工具; 2周后选取其中189人进行重测。结果:IPANAT中文版包含36个条目,由内隐积极情感(IPA)和内隐消极情感(INA) 2个因子构成,2个因子解释总方差变异的80. 1%;验证性因子分析表明两因子模型拟合较好(χ2/df=1. 98,RMSEA=0. 04,CFI=0. 99,NFI=0. 99,GFI=0. 99); IPA得分与PANAS积极情感得分、INA得分与PANAS消极情感得分均呈正相关(ICC=0. 21、0. 28,均P <0. 01)。IPA和INA的Cronbachα系数分别为0. 87和0. 88,重测信度分别为0. 72和0. 73。结论:内隐积极消极情感量表中文版具有较好的信度和效度,可以应用于大学生内隐情感的测量。

Objective： To explore the application of the Implicit Positive and Negative Affect Test（ IPANAT）in college students. Methods： Totally 867 college students from freshman to seniors were assessed with the Chinese version of IPANAT and Positive and Negative Affect Schedule（ PANAS）. Among them,189 students completed the re-test after two weeks. The Chinese version of PANAS was used as the criterion measurement. Results： The Chinese version of IPANAT included two components [implicit positive affect（ IPA） and implicit negative affect（ INA） ]and36 items. Exploratory factor analysis generated 2 factors,accounting for 80. 1% of the total variance. Confirmative factor analysis supported that the original two-factor model was well fitted in the sample（ χ2/df = 1. 98,RMSEA =0. 04,CFI = 0. 99,NFI = 0. 99,GFI = 0. 99）. The IPA scores were positively correlated with the PA scores,and the INA scores were positively correlated with the NA scores（ ICC = 0. 21,0. 28,Ps 0. 05）. Reliability coefficients of two dimensions were 0. 87 and 0. 88,and the test-retest reliability of each factor（ ICC） was 0. 72 and0. 73. Conclusion： It suggests that the Chinese version of Implicit Positive and Negative Affect Test（ IPANAT） has good validity and reliability in college students.