摘要
目的:检验注意过程中的线索提示是否调节其局部干扰效应。方法:采用单目标搜索范式,用E-prime软件自编视空间持续性注意程序,任务包括无提示无干扰、无提示有干扰和有提示有干扰3种条件,对60名大学生进行测试。结果:(1)无提示时,有干扰的反应时(187.98±44.87)比无干扰的(165.84±38.01)显著长(t=4.11,P〈0.01),这证明了干扰的消极作用;(2)有干扰时,有提示的反应时(163.05±38.63)比无提示的(187.98±44.87)显著短(t=-4.86,P〈0.01),这证明了提示的积极作用;(3)提示有干扰的反应时(163.05±38.63)与无提示无干扰的(165.85±38.01)无显著差异(t=-0.42,P=0.68),这证明提示对干扰具有补偿作用。结论:注意过程中存在局部干扰效应和线索提示效应;线索提示可以调节局部干扰效应,体现了线索提示的补偿效应;线索提示对注意干预或训练具有积极启发意义。
Objective:To test whether cue has compensatory effect on the interference with attention.Methods:Anew program was designed with E-prime software to measure the visuospatial sustained attention of 60 college students.Results:(1)The reaction time(RT)with interference(187.98±44.87)was significantly larger than the RT without interference(165.84±38.01)when there was no cue(t=4.11,P〈0.05),which proved localized interference effect;(2)The RT with cue(163.05±38.63)was significantly smaller than the RT without cue(187.98±44.87)when there was interference(t=-4.86,P〈0.05),which proved reminding effect of cue;(3)There was not any significantly difference between the RT without cue and disturbance(165.85±38.01)and the RT with cue and disturbance(163.05±38.63)(P〉0.05),which proved compensatory effect of cue.Conclusion:Interference has a significant effect on attention,but cue can counteract this effect,which is the compensatory effect of cue.It has positive effect on the attention intervention or training.
作者
巫春婉
廖婉莹
杨浩铭
廖媚
吴晓茵
周泽纯
党彩萍
WU Chunwan;LIAO Wanying;YANG Haoming(Guangzhou Medical University,Guangzhou 511436,China)
出处
《中国健康心理学杂志》
2018年第9期1391-1395,共5页
China Journal of Health Psychology
基金
2017年度广东省大学生科技创新培育专项资金(编号:pdjh2017a0411)
广州市哲学社会科学发展“十二五”规划课题(编号:15G99)
广东省教育厅教育科学规划项目和特色创新项目(推理能力训练的教学实践研究)
广州市第三批教育系统创新学术团队项目(编号:1201610032)