摘要
目的探讨晚期氧化蛋白产物(AOPP)对CD4+CD25-T细胞向CD4+CD25-T调节性T细胞(Tregs)转化的影响及机制。方法将CD4+CD25-T细胞按1×10^6/孔培养于平底96孔板,依据是否加入AOPP分为3组:对照组(加入人血清白蛋白200μg/m1);AOPP组(加入AOPP200μg/m1);抗氧化组(DPI100μmol/L预处理1h后再加入AOPP200μg/m1)。流式细胞仪检测各组细胞表型变化和DHE荧光强度,3H-TdR掺入法检测Tregs对效应T细胞(Teff)的免疫抑制功能,West-ernblot法检测细胞内磷酸化信号转导与转录激活因子5(p-STAT5)的变化。结果AOPP组中CD4+CD25+T细胞占(28.6±4.5)%、胞内因子Foxp3在CD4+CD25+T细胞中的表达率为(10.7±1.7)%,显著低于对照组细胞的相应值(73.8±10.7)%、(64.3±9.4)%(P=0.003,0.001);抗氧化组细胞表型分别为(41.3±4.6.4)%、(22.3±3.0)%,转化较AOPP组多(P=0.049,0.004),低于对照组(P=0.011,0.002)。在Tregs:Teff为1:1的情况下,AOPP组Teff的每分钟脉冲数值(CPM)为17521.0±1703.8,显著高于对照组的9932.3±1142.9(P=0.003);抗氧化组的Teff的CPM为15709.7±1272.9,高于对照组(P=0.004),但与AOPP组比较差异无统计学意义(P=0.214)。AOPP组DHE荧光强度为(163.0±11.5)%,较对照组(51.1±4.0)%高(P=0.000);而抗氧化组DHE荧光强度(113.4±7.8)%较AOPP组低(P=0.003),高于对照组(P=0.000)。AOPP组p-STAT5表达较对照组低(P=0.006);而抗氧化组p-STAT5表达较AOPP组显著性上调(P=0.008),但仍低于对照组(P=0.043)。结论AOPP抑制CD4+CD25-T细胞向Tregs转化,其机制可能是通过氧化应激下调p-STAT5的表达。
Objective To investigate the effect and mechanism of advanced oxidation protein products (AOPP) on the converting of CCD4± CD25- T cells into CD4± CD25- regulatory T cells ( Tregs). Methods CD4± CD25- T cells were cultured in 96 - well plates ( 1 x 106 cells/well), and were divided according to the presence of AOPP into 3 different groups: Control group (200 μg/ml serum albumin) , AOPP group (200 μg/ml AOPP), Antioxidant group (pretreated with 100 μg/ml diphenyleneiodonium (DPI) 1 h before AOPP was added). Flow cytometry was used to detect the pbenotype of CD4± CD25- T cells and the DHE fluorescence intensity. The induced Tregs were collected and cultured with CD4± CD25-T ceils as the effective cells (Teff) , the incorporation of [3HI thymidine was used to evaluate the suppressive function of iTregs on the Teff. Western blotting was used to observe the expression of phospho- rylated signal transducer and activators of transcription 5 (p - STATS ). Results In AOPP group, ( 28.6 _± 4. 5 ) % of CIM cells expressed CD25 and ( 10. 7 ± 1.7 ) % of CD4 ~ CD25 ± T cells expressed Foxp3, which were significantly lower than those of Control group [ (73.8 ± 10. 7 ) %, ( 64. 3 ± 9.4 ) % ](P =0. 003, 0. 001 ). In Antioxidant group, these values were (41.3 _± 6.4)% and (22. 3 ± 3.0)% , which were significantly more than those of AOPP group (P = 0. 049, 0. 004) , but lower than those of Con- trol group ( P = 0. 011,0. 002 ). When Tregs and Teff were incubated at a 1 1 ratio, the Counts per minute (CPM) of Teff in AOPP group was 17 521.0 ± 1 703.8, which was significantly more than that of Control group 9 932. 3 ± 1 142. 9 (P =0. 003 ). The CPM of Teff in Antioxidant group was 15 709. 7 ± 1 272. 9, which was more than that of Control group ( P = 0. 004 ) and no significant difference as compared with AOPP group (P =0. 214). The DHE fluorescence intensity of AOPP group was ( 163.0 ± 11.5) % , which was higher than that (51.1 ±4. 0) % of Control group ( P =0. 000) ; while the DHE fluorescence intensity (113.4 ± 7.8% ) of the Antioxidant group was lower than that of the AOPP group (P = 0. 003 ) and was higher than that of the Control group (P =0. 000). Compared with Control group, addition of AOPP signifi- cantly downregulated the expression of p - STAT5 in CD4± CD25- T cells ( P = 0. 006). After antioxidants was added, the expression of p - STAT5 was significantly upregulated compared with AOPP group (P = 0. 008) and lower than that of Control group ( P = 0. 043 ). Conclusion AOPP significantly inhibit the con- verting of CD4± CD25- T cells into Tregs through downregulating p - STAT5 via oxidative stress in vitr0.
作者
李凯
白晓峰
冯梅
石华
王元林
孙兆林
徐述雄
Li Kai;Bai Xiaofeng;Feng Mei;Shi Hua;Wang Yuanlin;Sun Zhaolin;Xu Shuxiong(Department of Urology,Guizhou Provincial People's Hospital,Guiyang 550002,China(Li K,Bai XF,Feng M,Shi H,Wang YL,Sun ZL,Xu SX;Zunyi Medical College,Zunyi 563003,China(Xu S)
出处
《中华实验外科杂志》
CAS
CSCD
北大核心
2018年第10期1902-1904,共3页
Chinese Journal of Experimental Surgery
基金
国家自然科学基金(81260112)
贵州省优秀科技教育人才省长资金项目[黔省专合字(2009)31]
贵州省卫生计生委基金(gzwjkj-2015-01-023)