寻衅滋事罪法理探究

Jurisprudential Analysis of the Crime of Provocation

法益具有制约犯罪其他构成要件的机能。寻衅滋事罪的法益包括社会公众平稳的生活秩序,其特点是社会生活中的任何人都可能成为本罪行为人侵害的潜在对象。寻衅滋事罪与故意伤害罪、抢劫罪等存在竞合现象,在排除因竞合犯理论适用其他重罪的情形下,寻衅滋事罪才有专属适用空间,在专属范围内需要根据情节限定寻衅滋事行为违法性的下限。寻衅滋事罪行为中的"随意""任意""起哄闹事"与流氓动机的认定具有同一性,都应当围绕行为人与被害人是否存在纠纷,其他人可否成为潜在被害人为依据。

Legal interest has the function of restricting other elements of crime. The legal interests of the crime of provocation includes the stable life order of the public. Its characteristic is that anyone in social life may become the potential object of the crime. The Crime of Provocation has a concurrence relationship with the crime of intentional injury and robbery etc. In the case of the exclusion of taking cognizance of other serious crimes due to the theory of concurrence, the crime of provocation can only be applied in space. Within the exclusive scope, it is necessary to limit the lower limits of the illegality of the act of provocation in accordance with the circumstances. The connotations of “random”, “arbitrariness” and “creating disturbances” in the act of provocation are the same as the hooligan motivation, it should be based on whether there is a dispute between the perpetrator and the victim, and whether other people will be potential victims.