期刊文献+

丙泊酚全麻对家兔腹腔内高压动物模型腹腔内压的影响

Effect of propofol general anesthesia on intra-abdominal pressure in rabbits with abdominal hypertension
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:探讨丙泊酚全麻对家兔腹腔内高压动物模型腹内压的影响。方法:选取健康雄性家兔60只,体质量4~4. 5 kg,采用随机数字表法分为丙泊酚全麻组(Ⅰ组)和利多卡因局麻组(Ⅱ组)。Ⅰ组选家兔耳缘静脉给药,诱导用药丙泊酚6 mg/kg,静脉注射,维持用药38 mg·kg-1·h-1静脉持续泵注。Ⅱ组以0. 5%盐酸利多卡因局部浸润麻醉。常规皮肤准备、消毒、铺巾,逐层切开腹壁进入腹腔,将测压装置置于上腹部腹腔内,关闭腹腔,监测腹腔内压。Ⅰ组持续麻醉下监测腹腔内压,即麻醉的维持期P1,测压结束后,停止麻醉药物。距P1测压结束后10 min第二次测压即麻醉苏醒期P2。距P1测压后20 min第三次测压即麻醉清醒期P3。局部麻醉组以时间为节点与Ⅰ组相对应。两组分别于麻醉手术结束后抽静脉血3 m L,监测血清等指标进行比较。结果:Ⅰ组P1、P2腹腔内压与Ⅱ组P1、P2比较,腹腔内压降低,差异有统计学意义(P <0. 05),Ⅰ组P3腹腔内压与Ⅱ组P3比较,差异无统计学意义(P> 0. 05)。Ⅰ组与Ⅱ组胰岛素、白细胞介素-10(IL-10)、白细胞介素-8(IL-8)比较差异无统计学意义(P> 0. 05)。Ⅰ组血管紧张素Ⅱ低于Ⅱ组,多巴胺高于Ⅱ组,差异均有统计学意义(P <0. 05)。结论:丙泊酚全麻可使家兔腹腔内压降低,使血管紧张素Ⅱ降低,多巴胺升高,对胰岛素、IL-10、IL-8的影响,差异无统计学意义。 Objective :To study on rabbit model of propofol in intra -abdonfinal hypertension animal, intra -abdonfinal pressure effect. Methods : A total of 60 healthy male rabbits, weighing 4 - 4.5 kg, were randomly divided into 2 groups ( n = 30), propofol general anesthesia group (Group Ⅰ ) and lidoeaine local anesthesia group (Group Ⅱ ). Group Ⅰ selected rabbit ear vein adnfinistration of propofol induced drug 6mg after intravenous injection of kg -1, to maintain the continuous infusion of drug 38 mg · kg -1· h -1. Group Ⅱ received local infiltration anesthesia with 0.5% lidoeaine hydroehloride. Routine skin preparation, disilffeetion and towel laying were used to cut abdonfinal wall abdonfinal eavily. The pressure measuring device was placed in the upper abdonfinal cavity,and the abdonfinal eavily was closed to monitor the intra - abdonfinal pressure. Group Ⅰ continuous anesthesia monitoring intra - abdonfinal pressure,that is, the maintenance of anesthesia, P1 pressure after the end of the anesthetic stopped,P1 pressure after the end of the second 10 min pressure measurement, namely anesthesia recovery period P2- After P1 pressure measurement,the third 20 min pressure measurement was P3 during the anesthesia awake period,and the local anesthesia group was corresponding to the group Ⅰ with time as the node. The two groups were compared with venous blood 3ml monitoring serum after the end of anesthesia operation. Results:Compared with group P1 and P2 ,the intra -abdominal pressure of group Ⅰ , P2 and group P1 decreased, the difference was statistically significant ( P 〈 0.05 ). There was no significant difference in P3 between group Ⅰ and group Ⅱ ( P 〉 0.05 ). There was no significant difference in serum insulin, IL - 10,IL - 8 between group Ⅰ and group Ⅱ (P 〉 0.05). Angiotensin Ⅱ group was lower than group Ⅱ ,dopamine group Ⅰ was higher than that of group Ⅱ , the difference was statistically significant ( P 〈 0.05 ). Conclusion : General anesthesia with propofol can reduce the intra -abdominal pressure in rabbits, and propofol can reduce angiotensin Ⅱ and increase dopamine level. There was no significant difference in the effects of propofol on insulin, IL -10, IL -8.
作者 张庆明 张建国 张利国 杨海霞 杨静 任辉 ZHANG Qingming;ZHANG Jianguo;ZHANG Liguo;YANG Haixia;YANG Jing;REN Hui(Affiliated Hospital of Datong University,Datong 037005,China)
出处 《临床医药实践》 2018年第11期807-809,共3页 Proceeding of Clinical Medicine
基金 大同市科技攻关项目(项目编号:2016102)
关键词 丙泊酚 全麻 腹腔内压 propofol general anesthesia intra - abdominal pressure
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献20

  • 1蔡宏达,杨华凌,林财珠.丙泊酚或异氟醚麻醉对肾素-血管紧张素系统的影响[J].临床麻醉学杂志,2007,23(2):93-95. 被引量:43
  • 2姜雨鸽,徐龙河,张宏.丙泊酚对肺动脉高压大鼠肺动脉的作用及机制[J].临床麻醉学杂志,2007,23(2):134-136. 被引量:6
  • 3张建华,顾文彤,李淑桂,黄俊伟,李日长.异丙酚、依托咪酯全麻诱导对血流动力学的影响[J].中国现代医生,2007,45(08S):78-78. 被引量:3
  • 4MURPHY GS,BRULL SJ.Residual neuromuscular block:lessons unlearned.Part I:definitions,incidence,and adverse physiologic effects of residual neuromuscular block[J].Anesth Analg,2010,111(1):120-128.
  • 5LIEN CA,MATTEO RS,ORNSTEIN E,et al.Distribution,elimination,and action of vecuronium in the elderly[J].Anesth Analg,1991,73(1):39-42.
  • 6SELCUK M,CELEBIOGLU B,CELIKER V,et al.Infusion and bolus administration of cisatracurium——effects on histamine release[J].Middle East J Anesthesiol,2005,18(2):407-419.
  • 7KOBAYASHI O,OHTA Y,KOSAKA F.Interaction of sevoflurane,isoflurane,enflurane and halothane with nondepolarizing muscle relaxants and their prejunctional effects at the neuromuscular junction[J].Acta Med Okayama,1990,44(4):209-215.
  • 8AOKI Y,SHAKUNAGA K,ASAHI T,et al.Anesthesia for a patient with stiff-person syndrome[J].Masui,2008,57(4):447-449.
  • 9KOTAKE Y,OCHIAI R,SUZUKI T,et al.Reversal with sugammadex in the absence of monitoring did not preclude residual neuromuscular block[J].Anesth Analg,2013,117(2):345-351.
  • 10MURPHY GS,SZOKOL JW,MARYMONT JH,et al.Intraoperative acceleromyographic monitoring reduces the risk of residual neuromuscular blockade and adverse respiratory events in the postanesthesia care unit[J].Anesthesiology,2008,109(3):389-398.

共引文献14

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部